On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Till Schneidereit
wrote:
>>
>> >> I have this working now. In the output I see quite a few lines of the
>> >> "??? (1)" form, i.e. the NonBuiltinScriptFrameIter has zero elements.
>> >> I'm not sure what this means... allocations triggered from within C++
>> >> cod
On 2/27/14, 5:02 AM, Brendan Eich wrote:
> Fitzgerald, Nick wrote:
>> Or in self hosted code, right? Maybe the iterator { value, done }
>> objects?
>
> Are we optimizing away { value, done } objects that can't escape (from
> iterators run afresh by for-of loops)?
No, except in the relatively rare,
On 02/27/2014 03:02 AM, Brendan Eich wrote:
Fitzgerald, Nick wrote:
Or in self hosted code, right? Maybe the iterator { value, done } objects?
Are we optimizing away { value, done } objects that can't escape (from
iterators run afresh by for-of loops)? If not, is there a bug on file to so
opti
Fitzgerald, Nick wrote:
Or in self hosted code, right? Maybe the iterator { value, done } objects?
Are we optimizing away { value, done } objects that can't escape (from
iterators run afresh by for-of loops)? If not, is there a bug on file to
so optimize? If not, please file and cite here. Th
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
> >> I have this working now. In the output I see quite a few lines of the
> >> "??? (1)" form, i.e. the NonBuiltinScriptFrameIter has zero elements.
> >> I'm not sure what this means... allocations triggered from within C++
> >> code ra
>> I have this working now. In the output I see quite a few lines of the
>> "??? (1)" form, i.e. the NonBuiltinScriptFrameIter has zero elements.
>> I'm not sure what this means... allocations triggered from within C++
>> code rather than JS code?
> Or in self hosted code, right? Maybe the iterator
On 2/26/14 5:20 PM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
> I have this working now. In the output I see quite a few lines of the
> "??? (1)" form, i.e. the NonBuiltinScriptFrameIter has zero elements.
> I'm not sure what this means... allocations triggered from within C++
> code rather than JS code?
Or in se
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Nicholas Nethercote
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Nicholas Nethercote
>>
>> Suggestions on how to do this properly would be appreciated. The
>> object metadata stuff is probably a better way to proceed here...
>
> billm pointed me to
> http://mxr.mozil
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Nicholas Nethercote
>
> Suggestions on how to do this properly would be appreciated. The
> object metadata stuff is probably a better way to proceed here...
billm pointed me to
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/js/src/builtin/TestingFunctions.cpp#1066
Hi,
I'm doing some profiling of pdf.js, and I would like to get the
allocation point for every object, either when it's allocated, and/or
when the JS memory reporter runs. This is for some ad hoc profiling --
I just want to dump the info to stderr so I can post-process it -- so
it doesn't need to
10 matches
Mail list logo