When can we expect release of 1.7R2? We are going to upgrade from
1.6R5 So we want to get the latest possible release.
Thanks
___
dev-tech-js-engine-rhino mailing list
dev-tech-js-engine-rhino@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tec
On Mar 4, 12:17 pm, Marc Guillemot wrote:
> > ECMA is pretty clear that ToBoolean on an object is true. Why would
> > you want to change this?
>
> I can't answer for Marcello but personally I want to be have the
> possibility *not* to follow Ecma spec to mimic browser behavior.
> Have a look at fo
On Mar 4, 4:00 pm, Marcello Bastéa-Forte
wrote:
> String is an object, right? But a non-null String (i.e. length==0) can
> evaluate as false... so it sounds like a contradiction.
Actually, strings are primitive values and also can have a object
form:
js> function f(a) { print(typeof a); print(a
Can it be done as a "non-standard" extension to rhino?
Marcello
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:25 AM, Attila Szegedi wrote:
> Honestly, there should be advanced type coercion. We're sticking to the
> LiveConnect "standard" for Java-JS interop, but my own opinion is that
> LiveConnect is outdated and
String is an object, right? But a non-null String (i.e. length==0) can
evaluate as false... so it sounds like a contradiction.
Is there no way to make a custom class act like a String in the case of
length==0?
Feel free to tell me you think this is a bad idea and breaks convention too
much.
Mar
Help on Rhino
Good day! I José Nicodemos da Cruz Júnior and I am doing a work
Completion of course on the Rhino. But need some case studies on the
subject. I wonder if someone could help me?
Thank you for your attention.
José Nicodemos da Cruz Júnior
BS in Computer Science
Awaiting response.
_
> ECMA is pretty clear that ToBoolean on an object is true. Why would
> you want to change this?
I can't answer for Marcello but personally I want to be have the
possibility *not* to follow Ecma spec to mimic browser behavior.
Have a look at following bug from October 2008:
https://bugzilla.mozill
I just committed a change to CVS HEAD where LazilyLoadedCtor objects
that Rhino itself creates in initStandardObjects() will execute their
buildValue() in an AccessController.doPrivileged() block. That way,
lazy loading of standard lazy-constructed objects will work regardless
of what are t
Honestly, there should be advanced type coercion. We're sticking to
the LiveConnect "standard" for Java-JS interop, but my own opinion is
that LiveConnect is outdated and we should enhance it any way we see
fit (starting with recognizing boolean as a first-class data type!).
Automatically c
Ruland,
OK - that's what I ended up doing last night. I was just hoping there
would be some sort of more advanced type coercion system. No biggie -
thanks!
Patrick
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:12 AM, Ruland Kevin-BHP637
wrote:
> Patrick,
>
> I'm typing this off the cuff, it might not be fully correc
On Mar 1, 12:44 am, Marcello Bastéa-Forte
wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I want to make a custom Scriptable object "false" when evaluated in a
> boolean context. Just as an empty string evaluates as false, I would like
> to make an object that evaluates to false depending on its contents.
>
> My first rea
On Feb 27, 8:19 am, Kris Zyp wrote:
> On Oct 8 2008, 6:15 am, Kris Zyp wrote:
>
> > What is the best way to get the AST representation
> > (org.mozilla.javascript.Node or appropriate subclass) of an existing
> > function (one that was created by evaluation)? Currently I am calling
> > JS toString
Patrick,
I'm typing this off the cuff, it might not be fully correct.
NativeObject.getIds() returns all the property names. This includes
array indexes. This snippet of code should properly decode arrays (or
array portions of objects) into the map. The keys to the array values
are the string re
My only question is why cant I extend java.awt.Color?
I tried JMColor.prototpe.foo = function () {
print('bar');
};
and JMColor.foo = function () {
print('bar');
};
On Mar 4, 12:21 am, Joseph Montanez wrote:
> I just spent an hour actraully trying to figure this out maybe I am
> doing
I just spent an hour actraully trying to figure this out maybe I am
doing it wrong but it works.
importPackage(java.awt);
function JMColor(r,g,b) {
// the same as calling super()
var color = JavaAdapter(Color(r,g,b));
// Do your contstructor stuff here
// return the object
re
15 matches
Mail list logo
