Re: Line Breaking

2007-08-03 Thread Boris Zbarsky
Masayuki Nakano wrote: > '-', '/' and '=' are not breakable if the next character is numeric. > > But the last case (2007-Aug-02) is not saved by the rule. Should we also > check whether the previous character is numeric? That could lead to issues with long organic chemical names. I'm not sure

Re: Line Breaking

2007-08-03 Thread Masayuki Nakano
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Aug 4, 12:51 pm, Masayuki Nakano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Japanese language can break everywhere except a few exceptions. I.e., we >> are breaking words always. So, for us, the old rule (only breaks around >> SPACE) is strange. Because some points (around punctuat

Re: Line Breaking

2007-08-03 Thread Masayuki Nakano
Boris Zbarsky wrote: > David E. Ross wrote: >> dates (e.g., 8/2/07, which I would usually write "2Aug07" to avoid >> confusion with 8Feb07) > > Arguably, the '-' in 2007-08-02 should not break either. Nor should the > '-' in "Examples 1-5". Nor in 2007-Aug-02. '-', '/' and '=' are not brea

Re: Line Breaking

2007-08-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Aug 4, 12:51 pm, Masayuki Nakano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Japanese language can break everywhere except a few exceptions. I.e., we > are breaking words always. So, for us, the old rule (only breaks around > SPACE) is strange. Because some points (around punctuations and > parentheses), we ca

Re: Line Breaking

2007-08-03 Thread Masayuki Nakano
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Aug 2, 10:12 pm, Masayuki Nakano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> I really want to find out what the jp-critical need for linebreaking >>> of Latin-1 text is. >> we need to break URLs in most cases, therefore, I think, we should break >> after

Re: Line Breaking

2007-08-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Aug 2, 10:12 pm, Masayuki Nakano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I really want to find out what the jp-critical need for linebreaking > > of Latin-1 text is. > > we need to break URLs in most cases, therefore, I think, we should break > after '/' for path part of URLs.