[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 9 elo, 18:41, Masayuki Nakano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=275972
>
> I think there is an error in the "Should break inside" list where the
> second item says that the combination SPACE+NBSP is breakable.
> According
Well, I took Pike's word on that.
___
dev-tech-layout mailing list
dev-tech-layout@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-layout
On 9 elo, 18:41, Masayuki Nakano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=275972
I think there is an error in the "Should break inside" list where the
second item says that the combination SPACE+NBSP is breakable.
According to UAX 14, a non-breaking character pr
Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Well, I'm not an expert on chemistry, so I'll have to refer to Alan
>> Wood who originally raised the issue with chemical names:
>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95067#c78
>
> He raises an excellent suggestion: disallow breaks at '-
On 8/9/2007 6:26 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> Roman Korchagin wrote:
>> Seems to be nothing in the layout code that supports these CSS
>> properties. Is that right?
>
> Not quite. There's limited support for page-break-before and
> page-break-after.
>
> -Boris
>
This is a CSS2.1 capability tha
Roman Korchagin wrote:
> Seems to be nothing in the layout code that supports these CSS
> properties. Is that right?
Not quite. There's limited support for page-break-before and page-break-after.
-Boris
___
dev-tech-layout mailing list
dev-tech-layou
Seems to be nothing in the layout code that supports these CSS properties.
Is that right? I guess they are not important for a web browser and on
screen viewing. But I'm quite interested in good pagination features.
>From quick looks at the layout model supporting such keeps (page breaks are
no
7 matches
Mail list logo
