not a good idea.
to answer the topic question, yes you can have a library that has both
com and xpcom components, and in fact com and xpcom are binary
compatible. all you need is to make sure you have the entry points
required for both.
in xpcom, the entrypoint is NSGetModule (there are lots of mac
none of the gecko core people use microsoft projects to do builds.
iow: asking here for information about how to adapt a visual studio 98
(or 2002, 2003, 2005, 2007, ...) project is not a good idea.
to answer the topic question, yes you can have a library that has both
com and xpcom components
Is there any way to build in the same dll a COM and XPCOM object? I
tried to start with msdev 6.0 (sp 6, Platform SDK - winxp sp 2) an
empty COM project. Then, I tried to follow the steps in this tutorial:
http://www.iosart.com/firefox/xpcom/, but the compiler rise this error
for my
lop an application that will be able to export objects
> > >> as XPCOM or COM. Is there a layer for this. So that I write a single code
> > >> and with a define I can get XPCOM or COM objects.
> > >
> > > The actual COM and XPCOM objects are compatible. I.e., al
rt objects
> >> as XPCOM or COM. Is there a layer for this. So that I write a single code
> >> and with a define I can get XPCOM or COM objects.
> >
> > The actual COM and XPCOM objects are compatible. I.e., all you should
> > need to change is the registration
Christian Biesinger wrote:
Emanuel Dejanu wrote:
1. I want to develop an application that will be able to export objects
as XPCOM or COM. Is there a layer for this. So that I write a single code
and with a define I can get XPCOM or COM objects.
The actual COM and XPCOM objects are compatible
gt; Jon Smirl wrote:
>> On 3/3/06, Christian Biesinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Emanuel Dejanu wrote:
>>>> 1. I want to develop an application that will be able to export objects
>>>> as XPCOM or COM. Is there a layer for this. So that I write a single
Jeremy E wrote:
Does that mean that I can create any COM object on Windows from my extension
using script?
I think so, as long as the component supports IDispatch. It might require
some special prefs to be enabled. I don't really know the details.
--BDS
_
Emanuel Dejanu wrote:
>>>> 1. I want to develop an application that will be able to export objects
>>>> as XPCOM or COM. Is there a layer for this. So that I write a single
>>>> code
>>>> and with a define I can get XPCOM or COM objects.
>>>
bjects.
The actual COM and XPCOM objects are compatible. I.e., all you should
need to change is the registration code.
Does XPCOM offer dual interfaces on windows or do you need to use
invoke for everything?
XPCOM has no concept of IDispatch: scripting (xpconnect) is implemented by
inspecting th
COM or COM objects.
>
> The actual COM and XPCOM objects are compatible. I.e., all you should
> need to change is the registration code.
Does XPCOM offer dual interfaces on windows or do you need to use
invoke for everything?
--
Jon Smirl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Emanuel Dejanu wrote:
1. I want to develop an application that will be able to export objects
as XPCOM or COM. Is there a layer for this. So that I write a single code
and with a define I can get XPCOM or COM objects.
The actual COM and XPCOM objects are compatible. I.e., all you should
need
Hello,
1. I want to develop an application that will be able to export objects
as XPCOM or COM. Is there a layer for this. So that I write a single code
and with a define I can get XPCOM or COM objects.
2. Is there a problem with running XPCOM based application on Windows 95?
I know that Firefox
13 matches
Mail list logo
