From: Jason1 Lin
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3928
Windows-based system using signtool.exe to sign the capsule.
Add the support to using "--subject-name" argument to assign
the subject name used to sign the capsule file.
This argument would pass to signtool.exe as a part o
From: Jason1 Lin
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3928
Windows-based system using signtool.exe to sign the capsule.
Add the support to using "--subject-name" argument to assign
the subject name used to sign the capsule file.
This argument would pass to signtool.exe as a part o
From: Jason1 Lin
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3988
With the change #3958 using the incorrect variable to
store the S-ACM entry version.
That would cause the value always 0x0.
gFitTableContext.StartupAcm[gFitTableContext.StartupAcmNumber].Version
variable should be correct
From: Jason1 Lin
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3922
[Description]
CheckOverlap function would do incorrect split on the BiosModule which not
happen overlap.
This would cause incorrect value locate in FIT entry record.
[Condition]
- This BiosModule base address is lower th
From: Jason1 Lin
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3928
Windows-based system using signtool.exe to sign the capsule.
Add the support to using "--subject-name" argument to assign
the subject name used to sign the capsule file.
This argument would pass to signtool.exe as a part o
From: Jason1 Lin
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3928
Windows-based system using signtool.exe to sign the capsule.
Add the support to using "--subject-name" argument to assign
the subject name used to sign the capsule file.
This argument would pass to signtool.exe as a part o
From: Jason1 Lin
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3959
As per FIT BIOS Specification 1.2 Rules, the size bytes (3 bytes) /
reserved byte (1 byte) / CheckSum byte (1 byte) in type 2 are
must-be-zero (MBZ).
These bytes could be override for the other usages.
This change is used
From: Jason1 Lin
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3958
FitGen tool exists lots of typecasting and pointer usage.
This code change is used to reduce these in FillFitTable ()
and GetFitEntryInfo ().
To make code more clearly and easy to read.
Signed-off-by: Jason1 Lin
Cc: Bob
From: Jason1 Lin
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3958
Within current FitGen tool there had limitation only allow
one S-ACM to generate the Type 2 entry.
This code change is used to support multiple type 2 entries up to 0x20.
Signed-off-by: Jason1 Lin
Cc: Bob Feng
Cc: Limin
From: Jason1 Lin
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3959
As per FIT BIOS Specification 1.2 Rules, the size bytes (3 bytes)/
reserved byte (1 byte) / CheckSum byte (1 byte) in type 2 are must-be-zero
(MBZ).
These bytes could be override for the other usages.
In the future, if th
From: Jason1 Lin
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3958
Within current FitGen tool there had limitation only allow
one S-ACM to generate the Type 2 entry.
This code change is used to support multiple type 2 entries up to 0x20.
Signed-off-by: Jason1 Lin
Cc: Bob Feng
Cc: Limin
From: Jason1 Lin
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3958
Within current FitGen tool there had limitation only allow
one S-ACM to generate the Type 2 entry.
This code change is used to support multiple type 2 entries up to 0x20.
Signed-off-by: Jason1 Lin
Cc: Bob Feng
Cc: Limin
From: Jason1 Lin
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3959
As per FIT BIOS Specification 1.2 Rules, the size bytes (3 bytes)/
reserved byte (1 byte) / CheckSum byte (1 byte) in type 2 are must-be-zero
(MBZ).
These bytes could be override for the other usages.
In the future, if th
From: Jason1 Lin
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3922
[Description]
CheckOverlap function would do incorrect split on the BiosModule
which not happen overlap.
This would cause incorrect value locate in FIT entry record.
[Condition]
- This BiosModule base address is lower tha
Hi Bob,
Agree.
Check the size first is more readable than do the type conversion.
That would be align with the address check.
I would send out patch v2 based on this change.
Thanks,
Jason.
-Original Message-
From: Feng, Bob C
Sent: Saturday, June 4, 2022 12:08
To: Lin, Jason1 ; devel
15 matches
Mail list logo