On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 20:55, Oliver Smith-Denny
wrote:
>
> On 2/14/2024 11:50 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > I looked at the EFI spec again, and EfiACPIReclaimMemory is not
> > actually listed as a memory type that has this 64k alignment
> > requirement. This makes sense, given that this memory
On 2/14/2024 11:50 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
I looked at the EFI spec again, and EfiACPIReclaimMemory is not
actually listed as a memory type that has this 64k alignment
requirement. This makes sense, given that this memory type has no
significance to the firmware itself, only to the OS. OTOH,
On 2/15/2024 9:21 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
Of the two options you presented in this paragraph, I prefer the one
where the allocation presented to the caller may not be aligned, but
the region plus guards is.
But disabling it entirely for these regions is still perfectly fine
with me,
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 18:08, Oliver Smith-Denny
wrote:
>
> On 2/14/2024 11:50 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote> On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at
> 01:34, Oliver Smith-Denny
> > wrote >> This could also be fixed with
> > rearchitecting the heap guard system to
> >> respect alignment requirements and shift the
