Hi Christian,
I think about BZ 1895 again, and your suggestion of "change the hash to include
the arch" is better. I've sent the v2 patch to enhance it.
BTW, the CopyFileOnChange() is still necessary for BZ 1894.
Thanks
Steven Shi
Intel\SSG\FID\Firmware Infrastructure
From: Rodriguez,
Hi Steven,
This looks good, thank you.
Thanks,
Christian
From: Shi, Steven
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2019 8:30 PM
To: Rodriguez, Christian ; devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Gao, Liming ; Feng, Bob C
Subject: RE: [PATCH] BaseTools: Cannot store library cache of different arch
together
Sorry, the
Sorry, the CopyFileOnChange() will ensure only once IO store/restore writing
for each library. The extra IO read is ok.
Thanks
Steven Shi
Intel\SSG\FID\Firmware Infrastructure
From: Shi, Steven
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 11:24 AM
To: Rodriguez, Christian ; devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Gao,
Hi Christian,
For the extra IO accesses for duplicated library, I plan to introduce the
CopyFileOnChange() function to solve it. Below is the CopyFileOnChange() BZ,
and I haven't sent its patch yet. The CopyFileOnChange() will ensure only once
IO store/restore access for each library. To avoid
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1895
Build cache cannot store cache for the same library modules
in different arch together. E.g. Both the below IA32 and X64
arch BaseLib caches should exist after build Ovmf3264, but now
only the one in X64 arch exist.
The reason is the current
