Hello Jeshua,
On 1/9/24 17:55, Jeshua Smith wrote:
Two physical packages are on a multi-chip module and share resources on
the module. The module then plugs into the baseboard/motherboard.
Is it possible to elaborate on the resource being shared ?
In our specific case the problem is related
> > Two physical packages are on a multi-chip module and share resources on
> the module. The module then plugs into the baseboard/motherboard.
>
> Is it possible to elaborate on the resource being shared ?
In our specific case the problem is related to the PPTT's "Identical
Implementation" flag
On 1/9/24 16:47, Jeshua Smith wrote:
From: Pierre Gondois
Sent: Tuesday, January 9, 2024 1:22 AM
On 1/8/24 19:12, Jeshua Smith wrote:
The code was incorrectly assuming that root nodes had to be physical
package nodes and vice versa. This is not always true, so the check is
being removed.
> From: Pierre Gondois
> Sent: Tuesday, January 9, 2024 1:22 AM
> On 1/8/24 19:12, Jeshua Smith wrote:
> > The code was incorrectly assuming that root nodes had to be physical
> > package nodes and vice versa. This is not always true, so the check is
> > being removed.
>
> Does it mean that you
Hello Jeshua,
On 1/8/24 19:12, Jeshua Smith wrote:
The code was incorrectly assuming that root nodes had to be physical
package nodes and vice versa. This is not always true, so the check
is being removed.
Does it mean that you have a topology where the top-level node is not
a physical package
The code was incorrectly assuming that root nodes had to be physical
package nodes and vice versa. This is not always true, so the check
is being removed.
Signed-off-by: Jeshua Smith
Tested-by: Ashish Singhal
Reviewed-by: Ashish Singhal
---
.../SsdtCpuTopologyGenerator.c| 23 ++
