Thank you Jiewen :)
From: Yao, Jiewen
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2022 3:21 PM
To: Boeuf, Sebastien ; kra...@redhat.com
; devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Justen, Jordan L
Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 0/3] CloudHv: Rely on PVH boot specification
I updated release
t distract people.
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Boeuf, Sebastien
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 10:03 PM
> > > To: kra...@redhat.com; Yao, Jiewen ;
> > > devel@edk2.groups.io
> > > Cc: Justen, Jord
nesday, February 23, 2022 10:03 PM
> > To: kra...@redhat.com; Yao, Jiewen ;
> > devel@edk2.groups.io
> > Cc: Justen, Jordan L
> > Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 0/3] CloudHv: Rely on PVH boot
> > specification
> >
> > On Wed, 2022-02-23 at 13:11 +,
redhat.com; Yao, Jiewen ;
> > devel@edk2.groups.io
> > Cc: Justen, Jordan L
> > Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 0/3] CloudHv: Rely on PVH boot
> > specification
> >
> > On Wed, 2022-02-23 at 13:11 +, Yao, Jiewen wrote:
> > > If you want to
> devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Justen, Jordan L
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 0/3] CloudHv: Rely on PVH boot specification
>
> On Wed, 2022-02-23 at 13:11 +, Yao, Jiewen wrote:
> > If you want to support PVH-only, that means you *defeature* the
> > CloudHv
ovm is a good example -
> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/OvmfPkg/Microvm/README.
>
> Thank you
> Yao Jiewen
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Boeuf, Sebastien
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 8:20 PM
> > To: kra...@redhat.com; deve
nk you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: Boeuf, Sebastien
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 8:20 PM
> To: kra...@redhat.com; devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Yao, Jiewen ; Justen, Jordan L
>
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 0/3] CloudHv: Rely on PVH boot specifica
On Wed, 2022-02-23 at 13:02 +0100, kra...@redhat.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Well that's a good question. If we expect the same target (CloudHv)
> > to
> > support both TDX and non-TDX, that means the generated TDVF will be
> > a
> > PVH ELF binary, which will require some special handling from Cloud
Hi,
> Well that's a good question. If we expect the same target (CloudHv) to
> support both TDX and non-TDX, that means the generated TDVF will be a
> PVH ELF binary, which will require some special handling from Cloud
> Hypervisor.
> Having two separate targets would simplify things a lot. What
Hi Jiewen,
On Wed, 2022-02-23 at 00:00 +, Yao, Jiewen wrote:
> HI Sebastien
> Here is some feedback.
>
> 1) Since this seems a new feature, would you please file a Bugzilla
> https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/ ?
Ok I will. Just need to wait for my account to be created.
>
> 2) Please also inc
HI Sebastien
Here is some feedback.
1) Since this seems a new feature, would you please file a Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/ ?
2) Please also include this new feature in release plan -
https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/EDK-II-Release-Planning ?
3) A clarification
From: Sebastien Boeuf
Cloud Hypervisor aims at emulating the minimal amount of legacy devices
and this is why the PVH boot specification is supported. The point is to
be able to share some information with the guest without the need for
emulating devices that would be present on real hardware.
S
12 matches
Mail list logo
