On 5/3/23 01:43, Corvin Köhne wrote:
thanks for checking. Type 4 is the local ACPI NMI entry. See
https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-src/blob/1d7355248b5cf3b0d09247c6c7c4ff2d40c39945/usr.sbin/bhyve/acpi.c#L627-L636
It's described in ACPI spec 6.5 chapter 5.2.12.7.
Thanks! I'll send a patch to
On Tue, 2023-05-02 at 20:25 -0600, Rebecca Cran wrote:
> I applied the patch and tested it. The UEFI Shell command "acpiview"
> reports an error. I enabled the "acpiview" command with the patch:
>
>
> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/Bhyve/BhyveX64.dsc b/OvmfPkg/Bhyve/BhyveX64.dsc
> index d0d2712c5662..0c04
I applied the patch and tested it. The UEFI Shell command "acpiview"
reports an error. I enabled the "acpiview" command with the patch:
diff --git a/OvmfPkg/Bhyve/BhyveX64.dsc b/OvmfPkg/Bhyve/BhyveX64.dsc
index d0d2712c5662..0c04e4834cf7 100644
--- a/OvmfPkg/Bhyve/BhyveX64.dsc
+++ b/OvmfPkg/Bhy
On Mon, 2023-04-17 at 14:14 +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 01:46:01PM +0200, Corvin Köhne wrote:
> > It's much easier to create configuration dependend ACPI tables for
> > bhyve
> > than for OVMF. For this reason, don't use the statically created
> > ACPI
> > tables provided
> Hi Gerd,
>
> thanks for your reply. It's mostly the same code. Only the start and
> end of the scanned range differ. So, it does make sense to share the
> same implementation.
> Where's the right place for this shared implementation? Is it
> "OvmfPkg/Library"?
Yes.
take care,
Gerd
-=-=-=-
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 01:46:01PM +0200, Corvin Köhne wrote:
> It's much easier to create configuration dependend ACPI tables for bhyve
> than for OVMF. For this reason, don't use the statically created ACPI
> tables provided by OVMF. Instead prefer the dynamically created ACPI
> tables of bhyve.
On 4/17/23 5:46 AM, Corvin Köhne wrote:
+
+/**
+ Get the address of bhyve's ACPI Root System Description Pointer (RSDP).
+
+ @param RsdpPtr Return pointer to RSDP.
+
+ @return EFI_SUCCESS Bhyve's RSDP successfully found.
+ @return EFI_NOT_FOUND Couldn't find bhyve's
