On 23/01/2024 17:10, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
Other than that, the patch looks great to me; I'd only propose one
(superficial) improvement:
rather than include , scavenge
#ifdef MDE_CPU_ARM
#include
#elif defined (MDE_CPU_AARCH64)
#include
#endif
from it.
Reasons:
(a) Those are the headers
On 1/23/24 16:31, Michael Brown wrote:
> The only architecture-specific portion of NestedInterruptTplLib is in
> Iret.c, which must manipulate the interrupt stack frame such that the
> return-from-interrupt instruction will not re-enable interrupts. The
> remaining logic in Tpl.c is
On 23/01/2024 15:51, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 at 16:31, Michael Brown wrote:
Add implementations of DisableInterruptsOnIret() for MDE_CPU_ARM and
MDE_CPU_AARCH64. In both cases, the saved IRQs-disabled and
FIQs-disabled flags are set in the stored processor status register
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 at 16:31, Michael Brown wrote:
>
> The only architecture-specific portion of NestedInterruptTplLib is in
> Iret.c, which must manipulate the interrupt stack frame such that the
> return-from-interrupt instruction will not re-enable interrupts. The
> remaining logic in Tpl.c
The only architecture-specific portion of NestedInterruptTplLib is in
Iret.c, which must manipulate the interrupt stack frame such that the
return-from-interrupt instruction will not re-enable interrupts. The
remaining logic in Tpl.c is architecture-agnostic.
Add implementations of
