Hi Leif,
Apologies, I had forgotten to send a patch to add myself as the reviewer for
ArmPkg.
I have now sent a patch to update the maintainer.txt at
https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/85812
Regards,
Sami Mujawar
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to t
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 10:21:59 +0100, Sami Mujawar wrote:
> > In fact ... we could use more help on ArmPkg in general. Would you be
> > up for becoming an additional Maintainer or Reviewer?
> [SAMI] I can start helping with the review of the patches to start with, and
> we can revisit the maintai
Hi Leif,
Please find my response inline marked [SAMI].
Regards,
Sami Mujawar
On 14/10/2021 02:14 PM, Leif Lindholm wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 21:52:13 +, Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud wrote:
For the RFC itself, I personally do not have any objection, and
welcome the addition of this protocol t
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 21:52:13 +, Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud wrote:
> For the RFC itself, I personally do not have any objection, and
> welcome the addition of this protocol to AARCH64, as long as it
> utilizes the PSCI services to achieve the OS boot requirements.
>
> It may be worth getting feed
Hello Leif,
>
> > > But it might be good to hear something from ARM whether the use of
> this
> > > protocol which "must be produced on any system with more than one
> logical processor"
> > > *should* be able to rely on anything being set up for it, or whether we
> > > need an aforementioned help
Hi Samer,
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 14:20:17 +, Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud wrote:
> > In PI, the only references I find to the protocol are in MM and SAL
> > protocols.
> > And we're not even looking at EFI_MP_SERVICES_PPI at this point.
>
> The PI 1.7 spec defined the EFI_MP_SERVICES_PROTOCOL in pa
