Friends
(At least in the case of...) When a message is sent via the http
interface to smsbox smsbox_req_handle calls charset_processing to
translate the text.
If the coding is UCS2 and the charset is not UTF-16BE it is converted
to utf8, thence to UTF-16BE.
So far so good.
But I have some ques
Check your log again Alexei,
Your SIM has 15 memory spots. When the first is taken, the second is used.
Hence the AT module reads from the first to the fifteenth :
at+cmgr=1
at+cmgr=2
at+cmgr=3
at+cmgr=4
... and so on
at+cmgr=15
Every time a new SMS is received, then it gets dispatched to t
Hi all,
don't hurry with the update, I already found some
minor bugs.
There's one strange thing when new AT cannot delete
a mesage from SIM, it reads it again and again.
The position cursor is mismatched.
Log :
2001-11-13 19:14:56 [15] DEBUG: Read from modem:
'OK'2001-11-13 19:14:56 [15] DE
Howdy,
> The previous At module's best result was 1 sms per 5 sec.
> I think we should change the AT in CVS with this one.
> Extremely recommended.
Great, I'd love to. Now if someone could just submit a properly formatted
patch for review...it might get applied. Feeling keen, Alexei?
See ya,
N
So when I use kannel I should make one http request per recipient?
Has anybody tried to send messages to more than 10.000 recipients?
How does it perform?
I mean it does create a huge network overhead.
Jacob
-Original Message-
From: Uoti Urpala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13. novem
Jacob Vennervald Madsen wrote:
> When I use AT or CIMD2 as smsc and sepcify multiple recipients separated
> by '+' in the http url, everything works just fine.
This "multi-send" feature is broken and should not be used. It doesn't
work correctly with any of the options that depend on or affect
Hi List
When I use AT or CIMD2 as smsc and sepcify multiple recipients separated
by '+' in the http url, everything works just fine.
The smsbox receivs the request and the bearerbox sends one message per
receiver.
But when I use EMI2 as smsc and specify multiple recipients, the smsbox
receives it
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 02:09:29PM +0100, Jörg Pommnitz wrote:
> The transition from revision 1.1 to 1.2 looks very suspicious
> to me:
I've reverted the contents of the wtls/*.png files to what they were at
1.1 (so now they are all 1.3).
Dave
--
David Holland =*= Systems Manager
Hi all,
since we still had some troubles with recent AT2
module,
I have tried the new AT module made by
Matthew.
The kannel I got from his page was installed in
production machine.
I was amazed by performance, it was really nice to
discover that siemens could actually be this fast!
The spee
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 02:06:41PM +0100, Jörg Pommnitz wrote:
> [jpo@jpo wtls]$ file *.png
> fig10o.png: PNG image data, CORRUPTED,
> fig1o.png:PNG image data, CORRUPTED,
I see rev 1.2 was checked in on 2001-10-31, that version appears to be
the problem, because the 1.1 files are OK. At le
The transition from revision 1.1 to 1.2 looks very suspicious
to me:
revision 1.2
date: 2001/10/31 18:59:33; author: keogh; state: Exp; lines: +0 -225
Kannel updates
revision 1.1
date: 2001/09/03 21:55:10; author: davi; state: Exp;
**
[jpo@jpo wtls]$ pwd
/home/jpo/CVS/gateway/doc/wtls
[jpo@jpo wtls]$ file *.png
fig10o.png: PNG image data, CORRUPTED,
fig1o.png:PNG image data, CORRUPTED,
fig2o.png:PNG image data, CORRUPTED,
fig3o.png:PNG image data, CORRUPTED,
fig4o.png:PNG image data, CORRUPTED,
fig4out.png:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 02:37:10PM +1300, Worik Macky Turei Stanton wrote:
> A lot of the *.png files under doc are corrupted.
Which ones?
> Are you the correct person to notify?
Not really; I just keep the machine running kannel.3glab.org happy. I've
cc'ed the devel list. Someone there might h
The SMSC I am connected to apparently doesn't support 60-series
operations.
Is there any way i can make kannel use 50-series operations instead?
Jacob
-Original Message-
From: Jacob Vennervald Madsen
Sent: 13. november 2001 09:25
To: Bruno David Simoes Rodrigues
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Su
It is alphanumeric.
Do you think it makes a difference?
Jacob
-Original Message-
From: Bruno David Simoes Rodrigues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12. november 2001 22:59
To: Jacob Vennervald Madsen
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: EMI2
Is your username alphanumeric ?
The code of
15 matches
Mail list logo
