> -Original Message-
> From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> "Nektarios K. Papadopoulos" wrote:
> > I think that passing octstr_case_compare to list_search, makes it to
> > search for at least one non matching list element, insteat for one
> > matching.
> > So I suggest changing i
Hi.
If people agree, I'd like to at least note the SIM buffering patch I
submitted to the list in STATUS (msgid :
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
BTW - I was wondering - how many people (count, not interested in names
:-) have CVS write access ?
TIA
Oded Arbel
m-Wise Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Ninety eight
haikannel wrote:
>
> That would be great. Please send them to me. I wanna to test those.
> Thank you,
>
> Le Nhu Hai
>
> Bruno David Simões Rodrigues wrote:
>
> > Is there any issue about including code to Nokia Smart Messaging, Wap Push,
> > Siemens MMC, etc in kannel ?
> >
> > Has anyone un
Benjamin Lee wrote:
>
> Yup, it works! Swapping the order of unlock_in() and unlock_out()
> statements at the end of conn_register() fixes the mutex problem.
I have commited this to cvs now.
Uoti and the other:
> > > at the end of conn_register, or (a cleaner way) by adding a
> > > lock_out/unl
Oded Arbel wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> If people agree, I'd like to at least note the SIM buffering patch I
> submitted to the list in STATUS (msgid :
> [EMAIL PROTECTED])
I'll add this.
> BTW - I was wondering - how many people (count, not interested in names
> :-) have CVS write access ?
something a
"Nektarios K. Papadopoulos" wrote:
>
> the diff with todays cvs is attached, in case I am not wrong.
patch applied to cvs, thanks!
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-
No, I meant this one :
http://www.mail-archive.com/devel@kannel.3glab.org/msg02382.html
though, I would like the developers opinion on the smsc-center patch
too..
Thank you.
Oded Arbel
m-Wise Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
"The purpose of morality is to teach you, not to suffer and die, but to
enjoy
Patch attached. pretty straight forward.
hope I've seen the last of 'em :-)
TIA
Oded Arbel
m-Wise Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
I learned that it is the weak who are cruel,
and that gentleness is to be expected only from the strong.
--Leo Rosten
<>
smsc_at2.patch
Description: smsc_at
Hello,
I am wondering wether a patch will make it into kannel soon to add SIM
routing to AT2 ?
I think it is necessary, and the sooner the better !
--
Matt
For electronic musicians ...
Vector Bass : http://mffmvectorbass.sourceforge.net/
For developers ...
TimeScale Audio Mod : htt
Oded Arbel wrote:
>
> Patch attached. pretty straight forward.
> hope I've seen the last of 'em :-)
any objections from your side Andreas?
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-21
Matthew Flax wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am wondering wether a patch will make it into kannel soon to add SIM
> routing to AT2 ?
Oded has submitted a patch, see STATUS file.
> I think it is necessary, and the sooner the better !
If you are interested in getting this in we need people reviewing
su
Hi all
How is the status about WTLS implementation.
Thanks for your answer
Bjoern
kind regards
Vodafone TeleCommerce GmbH
Architecture & Engineering
Bjoern Buettner
Daniel Goldbach Str. 17-19
40880 Ratingen
Tel. +49 (0) 21 02 / 97 20 13
Fax +49 (0) 21 02 / 97 15 14
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
Hello!
I have just compiled current cvs snapshot. And try to test it via fakesmsc.
all look fine but if i start it as, i have got (and it's ok)
$./fakesmsc -H localhost -p 1 -i 10 -m 10 "89021733068 206 text
nop"
2002-02-20 18:06:35 [0] INFO: Debug_lvl = -1, log_file = , log_lvl =
0
2002
In order to add (hopefully nice) throttling to the SMPP driver I'd like
to modify the behaviour of the gwthread_sleep function in
gwthread-pthread.c very slightly.
Currently the function receives the amount of seconds to sleep as a
double, multiplies it by 1000 to get that value in millisecond
I don't think I understand. as gwthread_sleep accepts times in double
and not integer, its easy to sleep for less then a second. for example -
I usually use gwthread_sleep(0.1) which sleeps for a tenth of a second.
what's wrong with the current implementation ?
Oded Arbel
m-Wise Inc.
[EMAIL PROTE
I second this. gwthread_sleep does what you want right now or
I'm missing something.
Regards
Jörg
-Original Message-
From: Oded Arbel
To: Alex Judd; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2/20/02 4:33 PM
Subject: RE: Modification of gwthread_sleep for SMPP throttling
I don't think I understand. as g
Title: Re: Request for Kannel SMS
Configuration
your configuration is wrong.
See this:
# SMSC CONNECTIONS
group = smsc
smsc = http
system-type = kannel
port = 15130
#connect-allow-ip = "127.0.0.1"
smsc-username = kannel
smsc-password = rL4y
send-url = "http:
Hi
everyone.
I have
applied the patch and tested some of it's functionality (global/default sender
and applied defaults) and I found that it does what its advertised to do (or at
least, it doesn't break anything important ;-). I liked the way default-sender
overrides global-sender, but I
Yes I know it's ugly that global-sender is needed, but
the alternative was my previous version of this patch, that had the problem of
allowing null sender sms to arrive to bearerbox. Then if you do not have
default-sender, the message with null sender would go to the
smsc.
-Mensaje or
After updating from CVS I start having some memory leaks on my smsbox.
allocations were reported to be made from octstr_split_words and
http_header_find_first.
Knowing what my application was requesting kannel to do I tracked them
down in three points.
But I am not sure this is all.
Anyway, the
I am also interested in getting answers to similar questions. When is the
next scheduled 'packaged' release of kannel due? Using CVS is good and all,
but in a production environment, people dont really feel safe using a tree
that is currently being developed on! My only thoughts would be to grab a
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 11:50:59AM +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> Uoti and the other:
> > > > at the end of conn_register, or (a cleaner way) by adding a
> > > > lock_out/unlock_out pair at the start of conn_destroy.
Hmm... if conn_destroy is being called in a context where it is still
possible that
"T. Martin" wrote:
>
> I am also interested in getting answers to similar questions. When is the
> next scheduled 'packaged' release of kannel due? Using CVS is good and all,
> but in a production environment, people dont really feel safe using a tree
> that is currently being developed on! My on
Hello.
As I see, kannel-1.1.5 doesn't implement optional parameters parsing
in smpp pdu's, and my operator sends me sms'es with the body in the
payload (thus setting sm_length to 0 and kannel thinks it's got an empty
message).
Are there any patches out there for this? (Maybe there are, and I won'
Hi all,
Please tell me can I send ringtone and logo to SMSC using SMPP v.3.3 ?
Haikannel
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Hello,
I was wondering do people throttle SMPP using aysnc HTTP requests ?
If so then can smsbox handle this ?
Also what are the best messages per second bandwidth ? Can it handle 450
SMSs per second ?
thanks alot
--
Matt
For electronic musicians ...
Vector Bass : http://mffmvectorb
>Hello,
>
>I was wondering do people throttle SMPP using aysnc HTTP requests ?
>If so then can smsbox handle this ?
there's no need to throttle SMPP. Its a windowing protocol so it
should slow down automatically. This is true for EMI/UCP too but
somehow this doesnt work properly at the moment.
>I am also interested in getting answers to similar questions. When is the
>next scheduled 'packaged' release of kannel due? Using CVS is good and all,
>but in a production environment, people dont really feel safe using a tree
>that is currently being developed on! My only thoughts would be to gr
Anyone want to redesign the website ? I am willing to
help out with the new design . if it's ok with you
guys ...
Cheers,
Hong Cheng
--- Andreas Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I am also interested in getting answers to similar
> questions. When is the
> >next scheduled 'packaged' releas
> To the group: Any objections to declare CVS as "stable 1.2.0" and
> "development 1.3.0".
Yes, It's about high time the CVS would branch. I'm all for it (it be
easier to sell my boss an upgrade to the latest version if it wouldn't
be tagged as "CVS" :-)
Oded Arbel
m-Wise Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
30 matches
Mail list logo