Hi All
a small patch to the http code to allow the http server to bin to a
specified interface.
Nisan
--- cvs/gateway/gwlib/http.cSun Nov 17 11:46:30 2002
+++ gateway-work/gwlib/http.c Sun Nov 17 11:45:51 2002
@@ -1922,7 +1922,7 @@
}
-int http_open_port(int port, int ssl)
+int http_ope
Hi Alexander,
ok, I tried to understand the patch. Here is what I sum up:
Within gw/bb_boxc.c:boxc_receiver() you create a msg of type ack and
fill it with values depending on the result of the smsc2_rout() call.
ok so far ok.
Then you inject the ack msg to conn->incoming. But I don't see any
u
Hi Stipe,
On Sunday 17 November 2002 15:05, you wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> ok, I tried to understand the patch. Here is what I sum up:
>
> Within gw/bb_boxc.c:boxc_receiver() you create a msg of type ack and
> fill it with values depending on the result of the smsc2_rout() call.
> ok so far ok.
y
Hi Stipe
I see that your implementation of optional parameters in SMPP is not quite
complete. The PDU code is done, but I dont see you using it as such in the
SMPP module, well at least in the CVS version. Do you have a more recent
version of smsc_smpp that does use your mods?
Nisan
Hi
any reason why this didnt make it to the cvs? Also why not apply it to the
data_coding in submit_sm?
nisan
At 08:42 PM 11/6/02 +1300, Alan McNatty wrote:
Here's Oded's patch against current cvs. Is working fine for me ...
On Sat, 2002-11-02 at 11:21, Alan McNatty wrote:
> In progress - am bu
Hi Nisan,
I guess waiting for confirmation from others that all is good. Good idea
to apply same approach to submit_sm, will have a look at that.
Cheers,
Alan
On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 10:14, Nisan Bloch wrote:
> Hi
>
> any reason why this didnt make it to the cvs? Also why not apply it to the
> da
--- Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:56:10 +0100
From: Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ignat Vassilev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: kannel devel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: problem with cvs-20021114
> Can you some body give me a point how will look
"gro
Hi Nisan,
Nisan Bloch wrote:
>
> Hi Stipe
>
> I see that your implementation of optional parameters in SMPP is not quite
> complete. The PDU code is done, but I dont see you using it as such in the
> SMPP module, well at least in the CVS version. Do you have a more recent
> version of smsc_smpp
ups, ok, I missed to add 'field-boxc-id' to the 'dlr-db' group in
gwlib/cfg.def. Fixing this right now in cvs. Please update your tree
and try again, should work now without the panic.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Vo
Stipe Tolj wrote:
ups, ok, I missed to add 'field-boxc-id' to the 'dlr-db' group in
gwlib/cfg.def. Fixing this right now in cvs. Please update your tree
and try again, should work now without the panic.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
10 matches
Mail list logo