RE: Problems using WAP with siemens S35

It looks like the wapbox is waiting for an acknowledgement from the phone. Does wdp-interface-name in core group match the IP address configured in the phone's WAP settings? This can be a problem with Openwave browsers if the machine has more than one IP address. Ian > -Original Message

RE: timeout

> This is a bug, I've been hit by it, but I still can't reproduce it. > I have it too with a 500 server error from a IIS, and once I suspected > it could be that, instead of the , I receive an empty page. > > Might be something related with the combination of the headers and the > empty page.

RE: Log

I think this is okay - I guess this is the difference between running it using cygrunsrv (as a service) and running it as a process? In the former case it would be the Windows SCM (Service Control Manager) that's controlling it. Ian > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mail

FW: Kannel & Cookies

kind regards Vodafone TeleCommerce GmbH Architecture & Engineering Bjoern Buettner Daniel Goldbach Str. 17-19 40880 Ratingen Tel. +49 (0) 21 02 / 97 20 13 Fax +49 (0) 21 02 / 97 15 14 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.vodafone.com www.vodafone-telecommerce.de > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- &g

RE: Kannel & Cookies

> Which device saves the cookies ? > A celluar phone cannot save the cookies, isn't it? > Does Kannel save the cookies local? > Is it possible to configure Kannel so that Kannel can handle cookies? They're kept at the gateway. Kannel will keep session cookies only (i.e. not persistent), but it do

RE: help...

> is there any way i can execute an external command or a > script just incase > a special key "X" is texted Of course, just use 'get-url' or 'post-url' with the escape parameters instead of 'text'. User guide has more. Ian

RE: Wap pages size

> 2002-01-11 19:03:37 [125] WARNING: WSP: Entity at > http://213.4.89.19/servlet/SvlInicio?PAsid=PzpXPyp&PAoid=335&f > ile=/opt/netscape/server4/https-MCDX_Brasil/docs/campanias/wml/MinhaCidade/i nicio.wml > too large (size 1533 B, limit 1400 B) > Can I change the size limit ? (Sorry about the cr

RE: dummy 1234 from number

> I have tried to use the at2 driver and found that there is a > usage of a > number 1234: > > /* Put a dummy address in the receiver for now (SMSC requires > * one) */ > message->sms.receiver = octstr_create_from_data("1234", 4); > /*message->sms.receiver = destination;*/

RE: label in logs to differenciate sendsms requests

> internet service provider A offers an e-mail to SMS service. he > forwards the message from his application to kannel and passes on > username to his local kannel as "customername". The request would be > routed to another wholesale provider using kannel as well. There the > username would appea

RE: error message

> can anyone explain this error message in the wapbox.log: > > 2001-12-17 10:06:13 [16835] ERROR: URL > doesn't start with `http://' 2001-12-17 10:06:13 [16835] ERROR: Couldn't send request to

RE: detect which modem has been called

> So it seems that smsc-id is not yet implemented neither in at > or at2 code. at uses the old SMSC connection interface, but at2 should work? > By the way it seems to set %i to 1234 for all incoming messages. That's because there's not really an AT command to query the modem for the MSISDN of

RE: dialup line setting

> is the setting up of the dial-up line necessary in the > following cases: > > a) WAP gateway in pc1, cell phone emulator in pc2 (pc1, pc2 > on the same > intranet) Not necessary at all in that case. > b)WAP gateway in pc1, actual cell phone (in this case i > suspect that for a > WAP enabled ph

RE: "cannot route message"

> I have installed Kannel, and configure it to run as a WAP > gateway in pc1. In > this pc also, there is a file .wml i would like to call form > my cell phone > emulator (as a home page), which is installed in pc2. I have > configured the > gateway option in the emulator to be the IP of pc1. > >

RE: forced smsc?

> > Ive got my virtualhosts(tm) working where I can have a > certain default > reply to a certain smsc, however, I'd like to know if theres > a way to force > it so sms replies go out a certain smsc. I'm using > forced-smsc right now, > which seems to only apply to incoming sms. > > i need to be

RE: Does Kannel work with PDA

> Do you want to run Kannel on a PDA? This might be possible > with embedded Linux, but what's the point? I think he means does it work with a WAP browser on a PDA (at least, makes more sense!)? If so, then I've only ever tested briefly with AU Systems' browser on a Palm Vx, but it seems to work.

RE: [BUG] smsbox

> does smsbox quit when she get error? Yes, all of the Kannel processes will quit after a PANIC level message. > we have got 100,000 msg in last 8 days and met the error only > several times. > so we think the url is correct. Okay, but the GET that the log shows still looks malformed to me, it

RE: [BUG] smsbox

> 2001-10-08 17:57:50 [8] DEBUG: HTTP: Sending request: > 2001-10-08 17:57:50 [8] DEBUG: Octet string at 0x808eb18: > 2001-10-08 17:57:50 [8] DEBUG: len: 76 > 2001-10-08 17:57:50 [8] DEBUG: size: 77 > 2001-10-08 17:57:50 [8] DEBUG: immutable: 0 > 2001-10-08 17:57:50 [8] DEBUG: data: 47 45

RE: [BUG] smsbox

> we are using Kannel 1.1.5 (no patches) and SMPP protocol and Red Hat Linux 7.1. > in last 8 days, smsbox process disappear several times (not bearerbox). > we check smsbox.log and found some panic message: > 2001-10-01 01:08:35 [3] PANIC: mutex_unlock: Mutex failure! > 2001-10-08 01:51:21 [3] PA

RE: Kannel 1.1.5 (SMPP) to SMSC-SEMA

> Hi all, > we use kannel 1.1.5 (SMPP-3.4) connected to SMSC-SEMA. > The messages from kannel to SMSC to Mobile come sended correctly. > When we receive a message( Mobile-SMSC-kannel) the field > short-message is empty and the field length is 0. > Where it can be the problem? > Use kannel 1.0.3 (S

RE: Character @

> I have problem to send character to Mobile. > It always show as 'd' in my Mobile when I try to send '@'. > I use SMPP connection to my SMSC and use kannel 1.0.3 This should be fixed in 1.1.5. If you want to fix it yourself, as I recall it was a typo in a character mapping table somewhere, can't

RE: bind to ip?

> Is there anyway to bind to an ip-adress aswell as port? > > I have severel ip-adresses, and I only want kannel to bind to one of > those, is this planned or already existent feature? > I thought that was what wdp-interface-name was for?

RE: RING on AT

> I am wonder what people do to set up the AT modems so that people only > send SMSs. What do you do to stop people ringing the SMS number ? > Do you set up call diversion on the SIM ? An M20 for example will get a bit confused when a call comes in but it does seem to recover after a few minutes

RE: smsbox port problem

>Quite strangely my Kannel (version 1.0.3) is not able to > open the server socket at smsbox-port. No matter what port > i'm mentioning there, the bearerbox simply isn't able to open > the listening socket. When i check by "netstat" then it > doesn't show that port in the existing listening so

RE: Parser to check the synthax of kannel.conf ?

> I found that when I make some synthax errors in kannel.conf, > boxes can't > start. I was wondering if someone has made a parser to check > if the synthax > of kannel.conf is correct ? If not, I will develop one in > perl and propose > it devel@. Don't the boxes perform that function already? I

RE: Alphanumeric Sender IDs on SMPP?

It's been our experience that this is something the operator has to allow you to do, by changing the source TON and NPI values valid for your connection. Ian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stefan Cars Sent: 07 September 2001 10:34 To: A

RE: No response for Siemens from Kannel!

You need to ensure that wdp-interface-name in the bearerbox configuration matches exactly the IP address that you have configured the phone to look for the gateway at. Ian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Raghav V Talasila Sent: 29 August

RE: Routing problems for SMS push

> Usually, everything is OK but yesterday, I saw a push request from > operator_A routed to B SMSC account. Is it due to to the fact I didn't put > "denied-smsc-id" directives in smsc groups ? Was SMSC A available at that time - can you determine this from the bearerbox log? Or see below. > If t