Re: [PATCH] bug in urltrans.c

2003-02-04 Thread Robert Galach
> > Dariusz Markowicz > > > +1 from me, the additional text field in some protocols are optional, there is no guarantee that it will be filled by smsc. Robert Galach

Fw: [PATCH]bb_boxc vs smsbox and wapbox

2003-01-30 Thread Robert Galach
debug("bb.boxc", 0, "boxc_sender: sender unlocked"); } Please vote and commit it to cvs. I think it may be important for everybody using wapbox. Regards Robert Galach

[PATCH] Race between boxc_sender and smsbox identification

2003-01-21 Thread Robert Galach
tex to struct boxc and forcing boxc_sender to wait on this mutex until smsbox will identify itself. Then sender starts his real job. Changed also smsbox.c to send cmd_identify even if boxc_id is NULL. The patch is attached. I hope it removes problem. Regards Robert Galach smsbox.c.pat

Re: [PATCH] unneeded counter increase?!

2003-01-21 Thread Robert Galach
+1 from me:) Robert Galach - Original Message - From: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:04 PM Subject: [PATCH] unneeded counter increase?! > Hi list, > > is this patch making sense: > >