Rif: RE: speed (smsc_at2.c)

2002-03-27 Thread anviscov
I think that at2 should autodetect speed if it doesn't find any speed setting, in the smsc group or modems.conf, or if the smsc speed setting is set to 0 regardless of the modems.conf setting, or the modems.conf setting is set to 0 - isn't that the case now ? No. Now you must set speed=0 if

Rif: RE: [RFC] feature freeze?!

2002-03-21 Thread anviscov
Well, didn't try this patch, but with the last one applied successfully (apart the 1 dlr row) on the latest snapshot and works fine with wavecom. So, thanks Oded, looking forward to see it applied to cvs. Andrea Da: Oded Arbel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Data: 21/03/2002 11:07 A: Stipe Tolj [EMAIL

Rif: RE: [PATCH] Resubmit: sim buffering support for AT2.

2002-03-18 Thread anviscov
Hi Oded, I'll try tonight your patch, by the way you say: this patch, allow you to work around the problem by not caring whether messages land in memory or not. I noticed that you don't care for +CMTI: messages, only for +CMGR. By the way when I got an sms which lands into sm memory I have:

RE: RE: [PATCH] Resubmit: sim buffering support for AT2.

2002-03-18 Thread anviscov
Yes, it will work. the main reason is that (a) checking the memory directly (+CPMS?) we can read messages that were stored before Kannel was activated. Checking also for +CMTI: and reading the single message Well, I haven't your patch here so I cannot look at it. BTW I can't understand

sim multinumber (OT)

2002-03-15 Thread anviscov
Someone told me it should be possible to have multiple numbers on the same sim. Maybe the can't be active at the same time. By the way on the same sim here in Italy it's possible to have multiple numbers, eg. 329/611 voice 329/612 fax 329/613 data Do you think it can be possible to

Rif: RE: smsc_at2

2002-02-26 Thread anviscov
we should do two things - (a) teach kannel to look for +CMT: and not any +CMT and (b) apply the SIM buffering patch Why does it do so with alphanumeric sender ? I guess it's modem dependant and nothing Kannel can do about. Hi there, I totally agree with you, we have to change to +CMT:,

Rif: Re: pthread/poll problem

2002-01-15 Thread anviscov
Speaking about Cygwin, how fast it is? I mean, is there any big performance difference in linux version against cygwin in W2k? In theory there is a huge performance difference, even against native Win32, and therefore (maybe even more) against Linux. Cygwin uses a single DLL to emulate