[RFC] CVS rules for STATUS

2002-02-19 Thread Stipe Tolj
I would like to advice that changes to the STATUS file in the gateway CVS module should *not* be logged to ChangeLog, two main reasons: 1) STATUS is not considered to be module specific code and hence ChangeLog messages about this file would fuzzy up the meaning of ChangeLog, IMO. 2) Acceptance

RE: [RFC] CVS rules for STATUS

2002-02-20 Thread Oded Arbel
Wednesday, February 20, 2002 1:25 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [RFC] CVS rules for STATUS > > > I would like to advice that changes to the STATUS file in the gateway > CVS module should *not* be logged to ChangeLog, two main reasons: > > 1) STATUS is not cons

Re: [RFC] CVS rules for STATUS

2002-02-20 Thread Stipe Tolj
Oded Arbel wrote: > > Hi. > > If people agree, I'd like to at least note the SIM buffering patch I > submitted to the list in STATUS (msgid : > [EMAIL PROTECTED]) I'll add this. > BTW - I was wondering - how many people (count, not interested in names > :-) have CVS write access ? something a

RE: [RFC] CVS rules for STATUS

2002-02-20 Thread Oded Arbel
ut to enjoy yourself and live." -- John Galt & Ayn Rand > -Original Message- > From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 1:00 PM > To: Oded Arbel > Subject: Re: [RFC] CVS rules for STATUS > > > Hi Oded, >