>Jörg Pommnitz wrote:
>>
>> I cannot comment on this exact problem, but it does not
>> seem to warrant a panic.
>>
>> IMHO a defect PDU should be dropped without taking down
>> all of Kannel.
>
>I agree. Defect send-in messages should not break further operations
>of Kannel.
>
I'll work on a
Jörg Pommnitz wrote:
>
> I cannot comment on this exact problem, but it does not
> seem to warrant a panic.
>
> IMHO a defect PDU should be dropped without taking down
> all of Kannel.
I agree. Defect send-in messages should not break further operations
of Kannel.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I cannot comment on this exact problem, but it does not
seem to warrant a panic.
IMHO a defect PDU should be dropped without taking down
all of Kannel.
Regards
Jörg
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Nisan Bloch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 16. Januar 2002