Stipe,
Would this patch solve it. Not knowing the protocol spec of SMASI.
I can try. But I took the code from smsc_smpp.c as template and AFAIK,
they had no such mungy p = *(p); thingies :))
Stipe
Harrie Hazewinkel schrieb:
Stipe,
Would this patch solve it. Not knowing the protocol
--On Wednesday, September 4, 2002 10:10 AM +0200 Stipe Tolj
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stipe,
Would this patch solve it. Not knowing the protocol spec of SMASI.
I can try. But I took the code from smsc_smpp.c as template and AFAIK,
they had no such mungy p = *(p); thingies :))
I came up
Hi All,
--On Tuesday, September 3, 2002 7:06 AM +0100 kannel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kannel compilation test.
Host: Linux geodude.3glab.org 2.4.2-2 #1 Sun Apr 8 20:41:30 EDT 2001 i686
unknown
Kannel compilation had warnings or failed.
the warnings on the unused variable are caused by
Stipe,
Would this patch solve it. Not knowing the protocol spec of SMASI.
Index: smasi_pdu.c
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/gateway/gw/smsc/smasi_pdu.c,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.2 smasi_pdu.c
--- smasi_pdu.c 19 Aug 2002
Could everyone that do code for kannel do subscribe the
devel-reports mailing list and fix the existing warnings ?
I'm subscribed and do fix if I notice warning. Last commit from Harrie
did cause some warning. Harrie, are you subscribed to devel-reports@?
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Could everyone that do code for kannel do subscribe the
devel-reports mailing list and fix the existing warnings ?
-Forwarded Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Kannel automatic compilation test for SunOS
Date: 29 Jul 2002 07:09:32 +0200
Kannel
automatic compilation test for SunOS
On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 22:34, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Oded Arbel wrote:
Hi.
Just had a talk with my resident GCC guru, and his
suggestion (which seems to work for me) is to #define the
functions as nothing, i.e.
#define func_name(a)
thats
Oded Arbel wrote:
Hi.
Just had a talk with my resident GCC guru, and his suggestion (which seems to work
for me) is to #define the functions as nothing, i.e.
#define func_name(a)
thats it. nothing after that. now GCC is happy :-)
Hmm, did you test the resulting bearerbox at least?!
I'm
On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 22:34, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Oded Arbel wrote:
Hi.
Just had a talk with my resident GCC guru, and his suggestion (which seems to work
for me) is to #define the functions as nothing, i.e.
#define func_name(a)
thats it. nothing after that. now GCC is happy :-)
Bruno David Rodrigues wrote:
On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 22:34, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Oded Arbel wrote:
Hi.
Just had a talk with my resident GCC guru, and his suggestion (which seems to
work for me) is to #define the functions as nothing, i.e.
#define func_name(a)
thats it. nothing
Bruno,
I'll apply this patch if you agree:
I renamed your function to gw_native_noop(), but everything as you did
and here is what I get while compiling:
usr/include/mysql' -o gwlib/gwmem-check.o -c gwlib/gwmem-check.c
gcc -D_REENTRANT=1 -I. -g -O2 -I/usr/include/libxml2/libxml
]
Subject: Kannel automatic compilation test for SunOS
Kannel compilation test.
Host: SunOS wapme.vs 5.6 Generic_105181-31 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-250
Kannel compilation had warnings or failed.
Output of 'make -s':
gw/bb_boxc.c: In function `read_from_box':
gw/bb_boxc.c:82: warning
Oded Arbel wrote:
Hi list.
The definitions for the gw_mem calls in malloc=native mode result in lots of
compilation warning - would it be possible to #define those in such a way as to
completly be ignored by the compiler ? as gcc doesn't like the meaningles statements
created by the
-Original Message-
From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 3:00 PM
To: Oded Arbel
Cc: Kannel-devel (E-mail)
Subject: Re: Kannel automatic compilation test for SunOS
Oded Arbel wrote:
Hi list.
The definitions for the gw_mem calls in malloc
Oded Arbel wrote:
The following patch is required to keep gcc from complaining about
implicit declerations when compiling the latest patch to allow smsc
specific stop and start
thanks Oded, just fixed that. I was on the road yesterday and didn't
have the chance to fix it.
Stipe
[EMAIL
automatic compilation test
Kannel compilation test.
Host: Linux geodude.3glab.org 2.4.2-2 #1 Sun Apr 8 20:41:30 EDT 2001
i686 unknown
Kannel compilation had warnings or failed.
Output of 'make -s':
gw/bb_http.c: In function `httpd_stop_smsc':
gw/bb_http.c:159: warning: implicit declaration
-Forwarded Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Kannel automatic compilation test for SunOS
Date: 02 May 2002 07:01:45 +0200
Kannel compilation test.
Host: SunOS wapme.vs 5.6 Generic_105181-31 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-250
Kannel compilation had
17 matches
Mail list logo
