Re: [RFC] SMPP enquire link

2002-08-14 Thread Nisan Bloch
At 11:39 AM 8/14/02 +0200, Stipe Tolj wrote: >You don't get submit_sm PDUs from the SMPP server, do you?! I guess >you mean deliver_sm PDU for MO messages? nope, submit_sm_resp, one of our providers can lag behind up to 500 odd messages.. >Ok, you want to splitt the send/receiving threads fr

RE: [RFC] SMPP enquire link

2002-08-14 Thread Oded Arbel
> -Original Message- > From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > I don't agree here - I personally don't like threads all > that much: they have their purposes, but using a new thread > whenever you need a new context is not a good choise, > especially if both threads need to

Re: [RFC] SMPP enquire link

2002-08-14 Thread Stipe Tolj
> I don't agree here - I personally don't like threads all that much: they have their >purposes, but using a new thread whenever you need a new context is not a good >choise, especially if both threads need to do IO on the same socket : major problems. >we just need better logic handling the "s

Re: [RFC] SMPP enquire link

2002-08-14 Thread Stipe Tolj
> What happens when there are a largish number of messages in the > msgs_to_send list, > 1. the send_messages loop runs and we end up with a situation where one > needs to throttle the throughput to the SMPP server > 2. the send_message loop now sleeps why is there a throttling in the loop? I don

RE: [RFC] SMPP enquire link

2002-08-13 Thread Oded Arbel
> -Original Message- > From: Nisan Bloch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Hi All > > We are experiencing the following problem with the SMPP module. > > 3. the io_thread doing send_messages now cannot call > send_enquire_link > regularly enough to check whether it is time to send an >