RE: [RFC] timeline for stable 1.2.0

2002-06-02 Thread Oded Arbel
> -Original Message- > From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 10:48 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [RFC] timeline for stable 1.2.0 > > > Hi all, > > can we do some voting for releasing the stable version 1.2.0 from the > current cvs head tree,

RE: [RFC] timeline for stable 1.2.0

2002-06-02 Thread Oded Arbel
EMAIL PROTECTED] (972)-67-340014 (972)-9-9581711 (ext: 116) ::.. The safest seat in a aeroplane is within the black box. > -Original Message- > From: Oded Arbel > Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 1:38 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [RFC] timel

Re: [RFC] timeline for stable 1.2.0

2002-06-03 Thread Stipe Tolj
Oded Arbel wrote: > > comes to think about it - it's stupid of me to submit the whole huge patch and ask >for special treatment of just one part. > Please ignore my previous email and commit the following patch, which only deals >with the memory bugs, to the CVS before doing 1.2.0 applied to c

Re: [RFC] timeline for stable 1.2.0

2002-06-06 Thread Stefan Cars
Sorry for my late answer! First I will check latest CVS and see if my problems still exists. Although, I have the same problem with CIMD2 DLR reports as recently reported on the mailinglist and that causes the kannel to crash which should be fixed.. --- > Hi all, > > can we do