> Hi
> Mgetty launches a program when it finds caller id to authorize user and
> passes
> CallerID and some other stuff to it.
> You can write script which takes CallerID and do whatever you want, for
> example
> access http sendsms intefrace.
> Its really easy, five minutes of work, maybe som
>I feel the same way, but my understanding is that Andrea want's to use
>the same modem for SMS and the incoming call. In this case sharing the
>line is hard (impossible??).
Well, as I may send sms by other connections,
I just would like to have bearerbox listen to incoming
ring, and then ha
>OK, in this case my suggestion is to leave Kannel alone
>and write a tiny program that does what you want. You can
>use smsc_at for inspiration, but maybe it's easier to just
>compile mgetty inside the Cygnus environment.
Ok, I'll try to compile it under Cygwin.
Thanks
Andrea
> I am wondering if it possible,
> with gsm modem, to listen to phone call,
> get the callerid, and replying with an sms to it.
> This to save an sms. Say you are using kannel to
> access a database by sending an sms, which kannel
> is answering calling an url which gives back always the same resu
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stipe Tolj
Sent: 23 August 2001 10:34
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sms answer to a ring call
Importance: Low
> I am wondering if it possible,
> with gsm modem, to listen to phone call,
&g
>that would be great if possible.
>Has someone experience with those stuff?
As Hubert said, I tried with my wavecom,
it's ok.
AT+CLIP=1
OK
RING
+CLIP: "+393479336220",145
RING
+CLIP: "+393479336220",145
So now I'm trying to implerment this in kannel.
Basically I think I have to change (dup
>Why would you hang up when you did not accept the call?
I don't want to accept the call, otherwise the caller is billed for it,
isn't it?
I only have to get it's caller id, and hang up.
>IMHO ATH is only meaningful after an ATA.
I don't remember the meaning of ATA.
>And: Why do you insist o
>I completely understand that you do not want to do this.
>What you want to do is reject the incoming call.
>I don't know the AT command to do this.
I tried with ATH and it works.
>In this case there is an alternative that at least two
>people (me and Hubert) think is much better than messing
>
>> By the way don't forget the other solution is easier
>> Under Unix enviroment, but not so easy under Windoze.
>Why not? It should work equally well under Windows.
You should try to compile mgetty, and then how can you run the script?
Andrea
P.S. please post only to the list, othewise I get
>A simple program (C, Java or whatever) that opens
>a serial port, initializes the modem, waits for RINGs and forwards
>the caller id through HTTP to Kannel is enough. Sounds like just a
>few hours hacking.
Uhm, so you would have Kannel and another program to initialise
the same port, I don't
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrea Viscovich
Sent: 24 August 2001 12:07
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sms answer to a ring call
Importance: Low
>A simple program (C, Java or whatever) that opens
>a serial port, initializes the modem, waits for RINGs and forwards
>the caller id throug
> > Uhm, so you would have Kannel and another program to initialise
> > the same port, I don't know if it's possible.
> > Andrea
>No, doing both, handling SMS and incoming calls over the same
>modem would require that smsc_at does it all. That's why I jumped
>to my current proposal only when yo
12 matches
Mail list logo
