See my answer below :
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Andreas Fink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Envoyé : lundi 17 septembre 2001 16:59
> À : Gildas PERROT
> Objet : RE: emi2 keepalive implementation ?
>
>
> >Humm... I am not sure if we understood each o
17 septembre 2001 13:02
> À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : Re: emi2 keepalive implementation ?
>
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >My SMSC doesn't support UCP31 paquets but supports UCP01 or UCP30 for
> >keepalive. Is the choice of UCP31 is considered to be the best
&g
>Hi,
>
>My SMSC doesn't support UCP31 paquets but supports UCP01 or UCP30 for
>keepalive. Is the choice of UCP31 is considered to be the best one or is it
>arbitrary ? What about UCP01 and UCP30 ? Would it be interesting to have the
>choice between those types of paquets in configuration ?
>
>Than
