Re: SMPP: possible to do RECEIVE_BIND only ?

2002-01-26 Thread Stipe Tolj
Nisan Bloch wrote: > > Hi > > here is a patch that should do it. Setting the relative port or > receive-port to 0 in the smpp smsc group config will disable either the > transmitter/receiver. I have to bind both with my SMSC, could someone > please test. > > Nisan > > --- ../cvs/gateway/gw/sms

Re: SMPP: possible to do RECEIVE_BIND only ?

2002-01-17 Thread Nisan Bloch
Hi here is a patch that should do it. Setting the relative port or receive-port to 0 in the smpp smsc group config will disable either the transmitter/receiver. I have to bind both with my SMSC, could someone please test. Nisan --- ../cvs/gateway/gw/smsc_smpp.c Thu Jan 10 20:23:48 2002

Re: SMPP: possible to do RECEIVE_BIND only ?

2002-01-17 Thread Stipe Tolj
Paul Keogh wrote: > > > Hi. We've got access to an SMPP interface, which sort of works... > > But the SMPP only allows us to do BIND_RECEIVER, not BIND_TRANSMITTER. > > Is there any way to tell kannel to forget about that BIND_TRANSMIT > > that it cannot have? > > > > Kannel insists on doing an e

RE: SMPP: possible to do RECEIVE_BIND only ?

2002-01-09 Thread Paul Keogh
> Hi. We've got access to an SMPP interface, which sort of works... > But the SMPP only allows us to do BIND_RECEIVER, not BIND_TRANSMITTER. > Is there any way to tell kannel to forget about that BIND_TRANSMIT > that it cannot have? > > Kannel insists on doing an endless 2-second loop of > > 200

SMPP: possible to do RECEIVE_BIND only ?

2002-01-09 Thread jakob . gaardsted
Hi. We've got access to an SMPP interface, which sort of works... But the SMPP only allows us to do BIND_RECEIVER, not BIND_TRANSMITTER. Is there any way to tell kannel to forget about that BIND_TRANSMIT that it cannot have? Kannel insists on doing an endless 2-second loop of 2002-01-09 10:42:48