Abd Rahman Johari wrote:
>
> well...
>
> i got the same thing while testing WAP PUSH yesterday.
>
> while i try and error pushing to my gprs mobile.
>
> one thing i also notice is that test_ppg won't take the control and content anything
>but default in test_ppg.c , what i mean is if i change
Jörg Pommnitz wrote:
>
> Could this be relevant?
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2001-11/msg00028.html
yeah, maybe we got some sort of race condition here.
I guess, it this is the fact I may try to reprocuce the error on one
of our Sun boxes to see if Solaris' pthreads suffert the
Hi
At 03:43 PM 1/16/02 +0100, Andreas Fink wrote:
>Got a new problem under high load.
what is highload?
>bearerbox is running and has delivery reports to deliver to smsbox.
>smsbox is down.
>an application is ready to fire lots of data to smsbox.
>
>Anyone have an idea what happens here? Maybe i
Could this be relevant?
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2001-11/msg00028.html
Regards
Jörg
well...
i got the same thing while testing WAP PUSH yesterday.
while i try and error pushing to my gprs mobile.
one thing i also notice is that test_ppg won't take the control and content anything
but default in test_ppg.c , what i mean is if i change content and control file, ie
the mobile p
> Got a new problem under high load.
Does this happen *only* under high load, or can it be reproduced (with
the same situation) under a very minor load?
> bearerbox is running and has delivery reports to deliver to smsbox.
> smsbox is down.
> an application is ready to fire lots of data to smsbo
Got a new problem under high load.
bearerbox is running and has delivery reports to deliver to smsbox.
smsbox is down.
an application is ready to fire lots of data to smsbox.
now we start smsbox up. here's what we get:
2002-01-16 14:09:20 [0] INFO: Starting to log to file
/var/log/kannel/kanne
