Re: smsbox_req_sendota broken?

2002-02-15 Thread Stipe Tolj
Angel Fradejas wrote: > > I see the point Stipe, thanks for your response. But before calling > ota_tokenize_ we have all this > > smsc = http_cgi_variable(list, "smsc"); > if (urltrans_forced_smsc(t)) { > msg->sms.smsc_id = octstr_duplicate(urltrans_forced_smsc(t)); >

RE: smsbox_req_sendota broken?

2002-02-15 Thread Angel Fradejas
e Tolj Enviado el: jueves 14 de febrero de 2002 15:47 Para: Angel Fradejas CC: Kannel Developers Asunto: Re: smsbox_req_sendota broken? Angel Fradejas wrote: > > No testing at all, just rushing through the code to add support for > the conig directives I'm working on but I'

Re: smsbox_req_sendota broken?

2002-02-14 Thread Stipe Tolj
Angel Fradejas wrote: > > No testing at all, just rushing through the code to add support for > the conig directives I'm working on but I'd say this function is > broken. shouldn't be borken, AFAIK. > > We have no initialization for Msg* msg, no msg_create at all. Ok, now I remember, I have be

smsbox_req_sendota broken?

2002-02-14 Thread Angel Fradejas
No testing at all, just rushing through the code to add support for the conig directives I'm working on but I'd say this function is broken.   We have no initialization for Msg* msg, no msg_create at all.   I cannot test SMS OTA, so maybe someone with the resources available for this please