Hi,
Dermot Bradley wrote:
>
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Aarno [iso-8859-1] Syvänen wrote:
>
> > > Nokia 9210 (at least our upgraded versions, don't know if all)
> > > Ericsson R520m
> > > Ericsson T68m
> >
> > I can add
> >
> > Nokia 8310
> > Ericsson T39m
>
> Siemens S45 certainly do
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Aarno [iso-8859-1] Syvänen wrote:
> > Nokia 9210 (at least our upgraded versions, don't know if all)
> > Ericsson R520m
> > Ericsson T68m
>
> I can add
>
> Nokia 8310
> Ericsson T39m
Siemens S45 certainly does unconfirmed and confirmed.
The Nokia 8310 I have
Aarno Syvänen wrote:
>
> Btw, should we not keep a list of devices some Kannel services support ?
>
> This would be a nice FAQ.
yep, I go even a step further and would suggest in adding this as a
table in a mysql db for the "new" Kannel web site.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Stipe Tolj wrote:
>
> Zhou Ye wrote:
> >
> > I wanted to know what specific handsets support WAP Push, appreciate it if you can
>share your expertise.
> > Also is any special hardward needed in the telco to handle WAP Push, or can we use
>say SMPP or UCP straight to a conventional SMSC and be O
Zhou Ye wrote:
> Also is any special hardward needed in the telco to handle WAP Push, or can we use
>say SMPP or UCP straight to a conventional SMSC and be OK? How should the message be
>composed?
I did not answer all, so here is the rest.
No, there is no special hardware required. WAP Push
Zhou Ye wrote:
>
> I wanted to know what specific handsets support WAP Push, appreciate it if you can
>share your expertise.
> Also is any special hardward needed in the telco to handle WAP Push, or can we use
>say SMPP or UCP straight to a conventional SMSC and be OK? How should the message b
Hi there,
I wanted to know what specific handsets support WAP Push, appreciate it if you can
share your expertise.
Also is any special hardward needed in the telco to handle WAP Push, or can we use say
SMPP or UCP straight to a conventional SMSC and be OK? How should the message be
composed?
