James Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've seen several SonyEricsson devices use this header, including the
> T68i. The Connection header appears to be using Token-Text to indicate
> that it is requesting an Encoding-Version upgrade. The Encoding-Version
> follows field appears as normal. I d
Bruno Rodrigues wrote:
There is an correct "Encoding-Version: 1.3" header, but before there is
an IMHO erroneous "Connection: Encoding-Version".
Connection header (0x09) is not marked as deprecated in last WSP
document, and I don't see anything that may confuse this
processing - Encoding-Version
James Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruno Rodrigues wrote:
>
> > "I don't understand the "Connection: Encoding-Version". It seems like an
> > error."
>
> This is how a WAP 1.3 device indicates that it is 1.3 compatible. WAP 1.3 remapped
> some of the WSP header hex encodings and will confus
Bruno Rodrigues wrote:
"I don't understand the "Connection: Encoding-Version". It seems like an
error."
This is how a WAP 1.3 device indicates that it is 1.3 compatible. WAP 1.3 remapped some of the WSP header hex encodings and will confuse WAP 1.2 and older devices.
If I remember correctly the d
> Here goes two minor bugs for T610, one is really not important and the
> other I don't know if it would affect anything because our CMG gateway
> also doesn't support it and Kannel is now patched to workaround it.
>
> 1. Error in headers sent.
> SE-T610 sends an erroneous header in WSP data: "
Hi there.
I got this working, with help from Ronan Derby.
There's code in smsc_oisd.c for unpacking 7-bit packed GSM which almost
worked when integrated into smsc_smpp.c - though it truncates the message
because it assumes that the expanded message will be the same size as the
original one..
Reg
Gosh, of course! I guess all the SMSCs I've used must have implemented the
DCS value correctly... so everything works...
On Tuesday, 2003-07-15 at 01:19:36 AM, Andreas Fink scribbled:
>
> On Montag, Juli 14, 2003, at 05:18 Uhr, Michael Mulcahy wrote:
>
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > In a similar pr
Now I realise why I had no answer. ;-P
On Tuesday, 2003-07-15 at 01:27:15 AM, Benjamin Lee scribbled:
> Of all the SMSCs I've used... they all use GSM 7 bit packed octets, rather
> than septets.
>
> A while back I was curious as to whether this was correct according to the
> SMPP specification...
Of all the SMSCs I've used... they all use GSM 7 bit packed octets, rather
than septets.
A while back I was curious as to whether this was correct according to the
SMPP specification... I had no answer.
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00099.html
On Tuesday, 2003-07-15 at 01:18:3
On Montag, Juli 14, 2003, at 05:18 Uhr, Michael Mulcahy wrote:
Hi All,
In a similar problem to Davids (below), we are doing a test to an SMPP
SMSC and they are sending back message text encoded as 7 bit packed GSM
alphabet.
Even though the SMPP driver calls:
charset_gsm_to_latin1(msg->sms.ms
Hi All,
In a similar problem to Davids (below), we are doing a test to an SMPP
SMSC and they are sending back message text encoded as 7 bit packed GSM
alphabet.
Even though the SMPP driver calls:
charset_gsm_to_latin1(msg->sms.msgdata);
this does not convert 7 bit packed GSM data to latin 1,
Kannel will keep acting as an ESME regarding to your telco's SMSC (the same
as it is now).
Now you have:
+---+ HTTP +---+ +-+ SMPP ++
|client apps|<>| smsbox|<->|bearerbox|<>|telco's SMSC|
+---+ protocol +---+ +-+ pro
Angel,
thanks for explanation. seems like i've got the point, but just like
to assure - it would be only *seen* as SMSC, i.e. it would be virtual and
act as ESME in SMPP logics, right?
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Angel Fradejas wrote:
> Hi Dziugas,
>
> Its purpose it's to ha
Hi Dziugas,
Its purpose it's to have SMPP and EMI interfaces from the client side (as
opposed to the server side now present).
So now, if you want to send an SMS through Kannel, you have communicate to
smsbox via sendsms-HTTP interface.
With smppbox and emibox, you'll be able to connect to that
Angel,
could you please explain, what's the purporse, architecture and principles
of those [smpp|emi]box'es, because it seems that I didn't get the point,
but it would be really interesting to know.
thanks.
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Angel Fradejas wrote:
> Stefan,
>
> Sti
Thanks for the answer.
Should i use alt-dcs = 1 together with the combination of coding = 2, i.e.
alt-dcs=1&coding=2&text=.. ?
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Illimar Reinbusch wrote:
> Hi
>
> First u have to set alt-dcs=1 so it will be FX.
>
> > I remember that there was an in
Hi
First u have to set alt-dcs=1 so it will be FX.
> I remember that there was an intereset in mailing list about
> Siemens SEO,
> especially Illimar Reinbusch, who reported that is's working for him
> (http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00221.html)
Yes it works perfectly for me.
Stefan,
Stipe is the one that developed the SMPP server module (smppbox), and also a
emibox.
I think he's waiting to make some changes to the configure/make process to
release them both.
Angel Fradejas
Mediafusión España, S.A.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.mediafusion.es
Tel +34 91 252 32 00
Fax +34 91
so, you are a provider or something? ;))
AFAIK there already exists "such thing" and what is left for you is to
add/modify access list, i.e. username and password for Kannel to connect
to your SMPP server. Kannel itself is not a SMPP server.
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Stefan
Yes, yes yes... I think you've got me all wrong now... We want to provide
SMPP access to send SMS through kannel, okey ? And someone on this list
said he or she had developed such thing to kannel and I'm interesting in
talking with that person...
/S
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Dziugas Baltrunas wrote:
Hi,
"SMPP server" usually is a software that runs at provider's side. You can
find information about SMPP in http://www.smsforum.net.
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Stefan Cars wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Of course I know kannel speak SMPP, what I want is an "SMPP server" which
> can be i
Hi!
Of course I know kannel speak SMPP, what I want is an "SMPP server" which
can be integrated with kannel.
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Arne K. Haaje wrote:
> Stefan Cars wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > We are looking into developing some sort of SMPP interface to let people
> > send SMs to us through SMPP and
Hi list,
I remember that there was an intereset in mailing list about Siemens SEO,
especially Illimar Reinbusch, who reported that is's working for him
(http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00221.html)
here is my code (72x14 bitmap, Windows BMP format):
http://smsbox.m-1.lt:13013/cgi
Stefan Cars wrote:
Hi!
We are looking into developing some sort of SMPP interface to let people
send SMs to us through SMPP and then deliver it to kannel. I thought I saw
someone talking of something like that on the list and thought it would
bad to re-invent the wheel again... So anyone, do you h
Hi!
We are looking into developing some sort of SMPP interface to let people
send SMs to us through SMPP and then deliver it to kannel. I thought I saw
someone talking of something like that on the list and thought it would
bad to re-invent the wheel again... So anyone, do you have something like
25 matches
Mail list logo
