Paul Keogh wrote:
>
> Hi Stipe,
>
> In the smsbox/static Octstr *smsbox_req_handle() function, the
> binfo argument is passed in but I can't see any assignment of
> it into the Msg sms struct - did you miss this in the CVS update ?
yep... shame on me... fixing in cvs, sorry.
Stipe
mailto:[EMAI
> I'm ++1 for this patch :)
+0, committed to cvs.
Stipe
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
phone: +49.211.74845.0
fax: +49.211.74845.299
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http:/
Patch seems to fix it Alex, thanks! :-)
Alex
- Original Message -
From: "Alexander Malysh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alex Kinch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:23 PM
Subject: Re: SMPP broken in cvs-20031016?
Hi Alex,
first of all: SMPP in ka
I (as the original author ;]) vote +1 as well.
Rene Kluwen
Chimit
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Alexander Malysh
Sent: donderdag 16 oktober 2003 22:37
To: Steve Kennedy; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PATCH] Re: cmti cdsi Patch
Hi,
I'm ++1
Hi Stipe,
In the smsbox/static Octstr *smsbox_req_handle() function, the
binfo argument is passed in but I can't see any assignment of
it into the Msg sms struct - did you miss this in the CVS update ?
Scrub that last email, I've just re-read the SMPP specs - and even the
provider's documentation agrees! They say that the source_addr_ton should be
0x00 if there's a + prefix on it, and 0x01 if there's no prefix.
I've told them anyway, we'll see what they come up with.
Alex
- Original Messag
Hi Stipe and Alex
Apologies, I should have really looked through the message in more detail
:-)
Looking at the SMPP 3.4 docs, a ton value of 0x01 is "international". Should
it therefore be 0x101 (Alphanumeric) if there's a "+" prefix?
I've spoken to the provider, and I seem to be the only custom
Ian Cass wrote:
>
> > What syntax are you using for this field and is it operator specific ?
>
> T-Mobile Germany, at least, are using this field.
correct. In EMI 4.0 there is at least the XSer 0c field for such
purpose. In SMPP 3.4 there is not such thing explicetly, but some
vendors (real-life
> What syntax are you using for this field and is it operator specific ?
T-Mobile Germany, at least, are using this field.
--
Ian Cass
