Alexander Malysh wrote:
>
> Hi Igor,
>
> ++1 for this patch...
> It's 100% wrong to use octstr_imm for non const c-strings. And this can also
> explain why we have seen panics with "too many immutable octstr"...
so, is there any need in changing code at different other places?
ie. gw/wap_push_p
Aarno Syvänen wrote:
>
> Hi List,
>
> Some new PPG fixes (see attachment). There are mostly about
> performance,
> removing some useless octstr_append_char. In addition, PPG now do not
> search optional headers from the message body. For doing this a new
> octstr
> function is supplied.
>
> And
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 13:44, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> Alexander Malysh wrote:
> > Hi Igor,
> >
> > ++1 for this patch...
> > It's 100% wrong to use octstr_imm for non const c-strings. And this can
> > also explain why we have seen panics with "too many immutable octstr"...
>
> so, is there any nee
Alexander Malysh wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 11 November 2003 13:44, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> > Alexander Malysh wrote:
> > > Hi Igor,
> > >
> > > ++1 for this patch...
> > > It's 100% wrong to use octstr_imm for non const c-strings. And this can
> > > also explain why we have seen panics with "too many immu
Certainly!
The same error. octstr_imm() is sutable only for static strings.
Stipe are you going to change it?
How often octstr_case_search is used in such circumstances?
Does it worth to create octstr_case_search(Octstr*,char*) ?
> -Original Message-
> From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PR
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 13:56, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> Aarno Syvänen wrote:
> > Hi List,
> >
> > Some new PPG fixes (see attachment). There are mostly about
> > performance,
> > removing some useless octstr_append_char. In addition, PPG now do not
> > search optional headers from the message body.
Igor Ivoilov wrote:
>
> Certainly!
> The same error. octstr_imm() is sutable only for static strings.
>
> Stipe are you going to change it?
> How often octstr_case_search is used in such circumstances?
> Does it worth to create octstr_case_search(Octstr*,char*) ?
I'll check the sources if I can
Alexander Malysh wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 11 November 2003 13:56, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> > Aarno Syvänen wrote:
> > > Hi List,
> > >
> > > Some new PPG fixes (see attachment). There are mostly about
> > > performance,
> > > removing some useless octstr_append_char. In addition, PPG now do not
> > > sea
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 14:08, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> Igor Ivoilov wrote:
> > Certainly!
> > The same error. octstr_imm() is sutable only for static strings.
> >
> > Stipe are you going to change it?
> > How often octstr_case_search is used in such circumstances?
> > Does it worth to create octstr
Aarno Syvänen wrote:
>
> Hi List,
>
> Some new PPG fixes (see attachment). There are mostly about
> performance,
> removing some useless octstr_append_char. In addition, PPG now do not
> search optional headers from the message body. For doing this a new
> octstr
> function is supplied.
>
> And
Alexander Malysh schrieb:
> attched you can find conn.c fixes for ssl enabled connections.
> Patch does following:
> 1) enable non-blocking mode for read/write ssl BIO
> 2) enable partial writing and buffer moving in ssl context. this is needed if
> we use non-blocking mode otherwi
Hi Thomas,
Version is cvs-20031103. Maybe it is a
bug, and this probably now belongs on the devel-list so I've cc'd it in. Could
you email me your patch?
Alex
- Original Message -
From:
Thomas Hager
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 10:27
AM
S
12 matches
Mail list logo
