Hi list,
just a quick RFC for adding lib dependency checks for solaris
sem_foobar() functions implemented in librt.a, in reference to bug #154.
This may be added to configure.in and hence made more smooth for users
that compile on solaris systems.
Stipe
mailto:stolj_{at}_wapme.de
Hi Stipe,
On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 16:17 +0200, Stipe Tolj wrote:
just a quick RFC for adding lib dependency checks for solaris
sem_foobar() functions implemented in librt.a, in reference to bug
#154. This may be added to configure.in and hence made more smooth for
users that compile on solaris
Utsman Abdurrahman wrote:
Dear All,
I found error when Iam trying to reinstall my Kannel 1.3.2 on make command
step. It is ok on configure step, with description :
Running system checks ...
[snip]
Checking for POSIX threads support ...
checking for working pthreads... yes
checking for
Hi,
On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 08:05 -0700, Utsman Abdurrahman wrote:
gcc -D_REENTRANT=1 -I. -Igw -g -O2 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -o
gw/bb_alog.o -c gw/bb_alog.c
In file included from gwlib/gwlib.h:104,
from gw/bb_alog.c:64:
gwlib/gw-rwlock.h:69: parse error before pthread_rwlock_t
Hi,
how about attached patch?
Stipe Tolj wrote:
Hi list,
just a quick RFC for adding lib dependency checks for solaris
sem_foobar() functions implemented in librt.a, in reference to bug #154.
This may be added to configure.in and hence made more smooth for users
that compile on solaris
Alexander Malysh wrote:
Hi,
how about attached patch?
yes, but do we need to include the lib on our own in $LIBS before
configure runs the Makefile.in mangle and substitutes the vars?! Or is
it enough to call AC_CHECK_LIB() and it will include it on its own?
Not sure.
Stipe
Hi,
On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 17:40 +0200, Stipe Tolj wrote:
yes, but do we need to include the lib on our own in $LIBS before
configure runs the Makefile.in mangle and substitutes the vars?! Or is
it enough to call AC_CHECK_LIB() and it will include it on its own?
It should be enough. Looks
Stipe Tolj wrote:
Alexander Malysh wrote:
Hi,
how about attached patch?
yes, but do we need to include the lib on our own in $LIBS before
configure runs the Makefile.in mangle and substitutes the vars?! Or is
it enough to call AC_CHECK_LIB() and it will include it on its own?
it's
On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 17:35 +0200, Alexander Malysh wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
how about attached patch?
Index: configure.in
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/gateway/configure.in,v
retrieving revision 1.145
diff -a -u
Alexander Malysh wrote:
Stipe Tolj wrote:
Alexander Malysh wrote:
Hi,
how about attached patch?
yes, but do we need to include the lib on our own in $LIBS before
configure runs the Makefile.in mangle and substitutes the vars?! Or is
it enough to call AC_CHECK_LIB() and it will include it on its
Alexander Malysh wrote:
Stipe Tolj wrote:
Enver ALTIN wrote:
It would be a bit better to be under or over semaphore support checks.
hmm, parse error ;)
it's now over semaphore support check, what ist a problem here?
Also, we might want to check the *-hpux-* or, sunos part of uname
output, just
Stipe Tolj wrote:
basically I'd like to go with Enver's idea to put it in the case $host
block, like we did for the libc_r.a and likse.a for OpenBSD and FreeBSD.
but consider this more as a +0 option. ;)
Stipe
mailto:stolj_{at}_wapme.de
Stipe Tolj wrote:
Alexander Malysh wrote:
Stipe Tolj wrote:
Enver ALTIN wrote:
It would be a bit better to be under or over semaphore support checks.
hmm, parse error ;)
it's now over semaphore support check, what ist a problem here?
Also, we might want to check the *-hpux-*
This is a test
--
Nick Clarey, System Architect| Sometimes when you fill a vacuum,
Trigenix | it still sucks. - Rob Pike
p +44-1223-478900 fx +44-1223-478901 |
Nick Clarey wrote:
This is a test
me too.
Hi list,
i had use DLR with postgres, in my Red Hat 9.0
(Kannel version cvs-20040928)
autoconf, don't work, then, I ejecuted configue this way:
./configure --with-malloc=native --enable-start-stop-daemon=no
--enable-pgsql --with-pgsql --with-dlr=pgsql --disable-ssl --disable-docs
It
Hello
My eyes can't see where the error is, I'm pretty sure is something
trivial, this is what is going on :
I have two smsc's configured using smpp, and I have problems with
routing, here are fragments of my config:
...
group = smsc
smsc = smpp
smsc-id = mi_te_24024
denied-smsc-id = mi_te_2665
17 matches
Mail list logo