[RFC] adding solaris lib dependencies

2004-10-06 Thread Stipe Tolj
Hi list, just a quick RFC for adding lib dependency checks for solaris sem_foobar() functions implemented in librt.a, in reference to bug #154. This may be added to configure.in and hence made more smooth for users that compile on solaris systems. Stipe mailto:stolj_{at}_wapme.de

Re: [RFC] adding solaris lib dependencies

2004-10-06 Thread Enver ALTIN
Hi Stipe, On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 16:17 +0200, Stipe Tolj wrote: just a quick RFC for adding lib dependency checks for solaris sem_foobar() functions implemented in librt.a, in reference to bug #154. This may be added to configure.in and hence made more smooth for users that compile on solaris

Re: Make error..

2004-10-06 Thread Alexander Malysh
Utsman Abdurrahman wrote: Dear All, I found error when Iam trying to reinstall my Kannel 1.3.2 on make command step. It is ok on configure step, with description : Running system checks ... [snip] Checking for POSIX threads support ... checking for working pthreads... yes checking for

Re: Make error..

2004-10-06 Thread Enver ALTIN
Hi, On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 08:05 -0700, Utsman Abdurrahman wrote: gcc -D_REENTRANT=1 -I. -Igw -g -O2 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -o gw/bb_alog.o -c gw/bb_alog.c In file included from gwlib/gwlib.h:104, from gw/bb_alog.c:64: gwlib/gw-rwlock.h:69: parse error before pthread_rwlock_t

Re: [RFC] adding solaris lib dependencies

2004-10-06 Thread Alexander Malysh
Hi, how about attached patch? Stipe Tolj wrote: Hi list, just a quick RFC for adding lib dependency checks for solaris sem_foobar() functions implemented in librt.a, in reference to bug #154. This may be added to configure.in and hence made more smooth for users that compile on solaris

Re: [RFC] adding solaris lib dependencies

2004-10-06 Thread Stipe Tolj
Alexander Malysh wrote: Hi, how about attached patch? yes, but do we need to include the lib on our own in $LIBS before configure runs the Makefile.in mangle and substitutes the vars?! Or is it enough to call AC_CHECK_LIB() and it will include it on its own? Not sure. Stipe

Re: [RFC] adding solaris lib dependencies

2004-10-06 Thread Enver ALTIN
Hi, On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 17:40 +0200, Stipe Tolj wrote: yes, but do we need to include the lib on our own in $LIBS before configure runs the Makefile.in mangle and substitutes the vars?! Or is it enough to call AC_CHECK_LIB() and it will include it on its own? It should be enough. Looks

Re: [RFC] adding solaris lib dependencies

2004-10-06 Thread Alexander Malysh
Stipe Tolj wrote: Alexander Malysh wrote: Hi, how about attached patch? yes, but do we need to include the lib on our own in $LIBS before configure runs the Makefile.in mangle and substitutes the vars?! Or is it enough to call AC_CHECK_LIB() and it will include it on its own? it's

Re: [RFC] adding solaris lib dependencies

2004-10-06 Thread Enver ALTIN
On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 17:35 +0200, Alexander Malysh wrote: Hi, Hi, how about attached patch? Index: configure.in === RCS file: /home/cvs/gateway/configure.in,v retrieving revision 1.145 diff -a -u

Re: [RFC] adding solaris lib dependencies

2004-10-06 Thread Stipe Tolj
Alexander Malysh wrote: Stipe Tolj wrote: Alexander Malysh wrote: Hi, how about attached patch? yes, but do we need to include the lib on our own in $LIBS before configure runs the Makefile.in mangle and substitutes the vars?! Or is it enough to call AC_CHECK_LIB() and it will include it on its

Re: [RFC] adding solaris lib dependencies

2004-10-06 Thread Stipe Tolj
Alexander Malysh wrote: Stipe Tolj wrote: Enver ALTIN wrote: It would be a bit better to be under or over semaphore support checks. hmm, parse error ;) it's now over semaphore support check, what ist a problem here? Also, we might want to check the *-hpux-* or, sunos part of uname output, just

Re: [RFC] adding solaris lib dependencies

2004-10-06 Thread Stipe Tolj
Stipe Tolj wrote: basically I'd like to go with Enver's idea to put it in the case $host block, like we did for the libc_r.a and likse.a for OpenBSD and FreeBSD. but consider this more as a +0 option. ;) Stipe mailto:stolj_{at}_wapme.de

Re: [RFC] adding solaris lib dependencies

2004-10-06 Thread Alexander Malysh
Stipe Tolj wrote: Alexander Malysh wrote: Stipe Tolj wrote: Enver ALTIN wrote: It would be a bit better to be under or over semaphore support checks. hmm, parse error ;) it's now over semaphore support check, what ist a problem here? Also, we might want to check the *-hpux-*

Test message

2004-10-06 Thread Nick Clarey
This is a test -- Nick Clarey, System Architect| Sometimes when you fill a vacuum, Trigenix | it still sucks. - Rob Pike p +44-1223-478900 fx +44-1223-478901 |

Re: Test message

2004-10-06 Thread Stipe Tolj
Nick Clarey wrote: This is a test me too.

DLR, Postgres, Red Hat 9

2004-10-06 Thread Mario Noboa
Hi list, i had use DLR with postgres, in my Red Hat 9.0 (Kannel version cvs-20040928) autoconf, don't work, then, I ejecuted configue this way: ./configure --with-malloc=native --enable-start-stop-daemon=no --enable-pgsql --with-pgsql --with-dlr=pgsql --disable-ssl --disable-docs It

I have a troubleshooting question

2004-10-06 Thread Oscar Medina Duarte
Hello My eyes can't see where the error is, I'm pretty sure is something trivial, this is what is going on : I have two smsc's configured using smpp, and I have problems with routing, here are fragments of my config: ... group = smsc smsc = smpp smsc-id = mi_te_24024 denied-smsc-id = mi_te_2665