Re: [RFC] wml->wmlc default character mangling

2005-03-22 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Remember that si, sl and ota would use conversions, too. Si I think that conversions should be into a separate module. Xml_shared.c ? Aarno On 21.3.2005, at 22:28, Paul P Komkoff Jr wrote: Replying to Stipe Tolj: Hi list, ok, following the thread frrom Rune Saetre [Msg-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] I co

Again high CPU load (99%)

2005-03-22 Thread Julien Buratto
I'm still experiencing on the CVS version. I've installed a stable one with the same identical conf files and bearerbox doesn't go on heavy loads. Julien

Re: Again high CPU load (99%)

2005-03-22 Thread Stipe Tolj
Julien Buratto wrote: I'm still experiencing on the CVS version. I've installed a stable one with the same identical conf files and bearerbox doesn't go on heavy loads. ok, can you provide us the conf file (clean out the smsc connect details) and the how the scenario can be reproduced, and we'll

Re: Crazy bearerbox uses 98% CPU

2005-03-22 Thread Jonathan Houser
Linkas, I'm running cvs-20050316 and my PS on a linux gives: USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND root 4621 98.2 0.3 94820 1816 ?SMar19 2943:00 /usr/local/sbin/bearerbox -d /etc/kannel/kannel.conf That's bad uh ? Suggestions ? General

Re: Crazy bearerbox uses 98% CPU

2005-03-22 Thread Jonathan Houser
Julien, Thanks! It's not heavily load, no SMS at all, just started and connected to SMSC. No, I meant that it sustains 98% CPU usage. If it does, that means it's still stuck in whatever loop it's in, so you'll be able to 'gdb' and backtrace it for something useful. Jon

Re: Bug under investigation

2005-03-22 Thread Paul P Komkoff Jr
Replying to Stipe Tolj: > yes, but it does not seem to impact for all other WTP transaction before we > roll the second WTP-SAR group towards the device. So I don't think this is > the cause. Even while it's interesting why etherreal reports this. Actually > Kannel is not doing the UDP checksum

Re: [PATCH] SMSC_CIMD2 Remove reply path parameter if not used

2005-03-22 Thread Stipe Tolj
Hi Peter, Peter Buki wrote: Hi, I created a patch for smsc_cimd2.c, because on Nokia SMSCs the use of reply path parameter is often forbidden. The original version (1.4) included it in both cases, mine includes when it is needed (1). It is up to you if you include it or not :-) hm, I'm -0 on this

Re: Kannel 1.4.0 and WTAI/WMLS support

2005-03-22 Thread Stipe Tolj
Hi Dermot, Dermot Wrycraft wrote: Hi, apologies if this is the wrong place 2 say this from newbie; I have been using Kannel and Mandrake 10.1 to test a Nokia TETRA terminal using IP WAP capabilities. I noticed that some of the function definitions in the wsstdlib.c in the kannel /wmlscript dir se

Re: Bug under investigation

2005-03-22 Thread Stipe Tolj
Paul P Komkoff Jr wrote: Replying to Stipe Tolj: yes, but it does not seem to impact for all other WTP transaction before we roll the second WTP-SAR group towards the device. So I don't think this is the cause. Even while it's interesting why etherreal reports this. Actually Kannel is not doing

callback_num

2005-03-22 Thread Rafael Ugolini
Hi, I sent a message a time to the list but i got nothing, so im sending again... I need to send messages with a specific callback_num, LG celphones doesnt reply the message without this option. Im using SMPP 33/34 in a CDMA Network. I tried to set callback_num in smsc_smpp.c : line 42