Hi,
seems patch works OK because no objections/bug reports :)
commited to cvs.
P. A. Bagyenda wrote:
> I have gone over the code and it looks fine, and is an improvement on
> what I'd proposed -- thanks Alex. Will also endeavour to test, but a
> definite +1 on my part.
>
>
> On May 16, 2007,
ok, commited to cvs.
Stipe Tolj wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Alexander Malysh wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> why it should be necessary now? we have utf-8 internally and you can send
>> any gsm-03.38 chars via smsbox.
>
> yep, +1, confirmed... my ChangeLog at that time:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander Malysh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> why it should be necessary now? we have utf-8 internally and you can send
> any gsm-03.38 chars via smsbox.
yep, +1, confirmed... my ChangeLog at that time:
2006-09-29 Stipe Tolj
* gw/smsc/smsc_fake.c: add T
Hi,
why it should be necessary now? we have utf-8 internally and you can send
any gsm-03.38 chars via smsbox.
Stipe Tolj wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Alexander Malysh wrote:
>
>> Hi Paco,
>>
>> please find attached patch that should fix SMPP charset issue.
>> I
