Re: Mysql with short wait_timeout

Hi, IMO, the extra thread overhead, if it is efficiently designed, is minimal, especially the more threads you already have. This is of course OS-depended, Solaris being more efficient with threads than linux. But again it should be minimal. With respect to redundant filesystem dlr srorage, I

Re: Mysql with short wait_timeout

Hi, Am 29.07.2009 um 17:51 schrieb Mathieu Bruneau: On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 3:33 AM, Alexander Malysh wrote: Hi, Am 28.07.2009 um 22:18 schrieb Mathieu Bruneau: On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Alexander Malysh > wrote: just add store support to inmemory DLR and you are done... but I

Re: Mysql with short wait_timeout

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Damián Viano wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 09:33:57AM +0200, Alexander Malysh wrote: > > The only issue you have, is max allowed connections in mysql and not > > kannel itself. > > > > Just make sure kannel always get connection to mysql and you will never > > s

Re: Mysql with short wait_timeout

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 3:33 AM, Alexander Malysh wrote: > Hi, > Am 28.07.2009 um 22:18 schrieb Mathieu Bruneau: > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Alexander Malysh wrote: > >> just add store support to inmemory DLR and you are done... >> but I'm --1 to keep DLRs in memory _and_ in storage. You

Re: Mysql with short wait_timeout

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 09:33:57AM +0200, Alexander Malysh wrote: > The only issue you have, is max allowed connections in mysql and not > kannel itself. > > Just make sure kannel always get connection to mysql and you will never > see issue there. Right, and it's not hard to do that (from mysq

Re: Mysql with short wait_timeout

Hi, Am 28.07.2009 um 22:18 schrieb Mathieu Bruneau: On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Alexander Malysh wrote: just add store support to inmemory DLR and you are done... but I'm --1 to keep DLRs in memory _and_ in storage. You choosed to use external storage to keep memory footprint low..