On Sun, 2010-07-04 at 00:58, Nikos Balkanas wrote:
> I am very sorry. My apologies for the missunderstanding. My
> impression is that identation means replacing tabs with spaces and
> aligning left text according to level. I see here that you are
> actually asking about source code reformatting and
If styling rules are one man's decision, better be acceptable and to a
degree flexible, or they will deter contributors from submitting work. Which
contradicts open source philosophy. Granted kannel is in better shape than
most other software, but there is always room for improvement.
BR,
Nik
[ You shouldn't post replies to me. I'm subscribed to list ]
On Sun, 2010-07-04 at 13:22, Nikos Balkanas wrote:
> If styling rules are one man's decision, better be acceptable and to
> a degree flexible, or they will deter contributors from submitting
> work. Which contradicts open source philosop
[You should reply to me, Cc the list, so that it is obvious from the
headers, to whom it is addressed]
Then I gather, from your own words that style is a collective decision. But
if you notice from the rest of kannel's code style has changed several times
since the beginning. Maybe the time ha
The maintainer won't accept it if it doesn't follow what he considers "proper"
coding style.
Style is not a collective decision at all. Someone has to make sure the code is
kept clean, readable (and of course stable in first place).
Some parts of Kannel code date back to 1999, so I guess there
On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 00:56, Nikos Balkanas wrote:
> [You should reply to me, Cc the list, so that it is obvious from the
> headers, to whom it is addressed]
Looks like you want to change the rules for mailing list too, not only
coding style. ;)
> Then I gather, from your own words that style is
@Milan,
Actually, this is quite normal to reply *to* specific person and cc to list.
This is nothing new, and in fact this is default behavior of most email
clients unless specifically forced to do otherwise (which i see your email
client - mutt - does - but also probably forced to do so by config
[ This is totally of-topic to the list. I will resist after that post
and sorry for this one ]
On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 01:54, Konstantin Vayner wrote:
> @Milan,
>
> Actually, this is quite normal to reply *to* specific person and cc to list.
> This is nothing new, and in fact this is default beha
Hi!
Just wanted to know if there has been any further discussion on this
issue and if there are any plans regarding it on the roadmap.
Thanks in advance.
Juan
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Alejandro Guerrieri
wrote:
> Alex,
>
> We have those parameters configured, and what Juan describes i
