Hi,
sorry for delay... I have limited inet access now... see answers bellow.
Am 30.06.2010 um 19:30 schrieb Nikos Balkanas:
> Hi,
>
> Please see inlined answers.
> Thanks for the comments and corrections. Please confirm a few remaining
> choices.
>
> BR,
> Nikos
> - Original Message -
Hi,
This is a classical maintenance vs overhead. Malloc is expensive, much
more so in Linux than in Solaris. Furthermore, sql="%s%S" is more
difficult to read and understand, since SQL mechanism is not explicit,
but hidden in variables. Do you really want that?
yes, because maintenance is t
Any hope this will be reviewed and committed?
I'm also working on a patch that adds TLV support to smppbox but I'd
like to get this one included first.
2010/7/6 Victor Luchitz :
> Yup, it's working fine now. Noticed there's another memleak though:
>
> another octstr_destroy(msgid); call is needed
