Alexander Malysh wrote:
>
> Hi Bruno,
>
> can you please first post such radical changes to ML before you commit these?
> It would be great first to review this patch... We are in pre-release phase
> now (imo)... or ?
agreed *fully* here!
Bruno, you *have to* ask for votes in case commiting cha
Am Sonntag, 20. Juli 2003 15:52 schrieb Oded Arbel:
[snip]
>
> > then it's a bug and must be fixed!
>
> well..
FYI: the bug is fixed now...
[snip]
--
Best regards / Mit besten Grüßen aus Düsseldorf
Dipl.-Ing.
Alexander Malysh
___
Centrium GmbH
Vogelsan
On Sunday 20 July 2003 15:48, Alexander Malysh wrote:
> > > then we should change Counter, in order to be able to handle long
> > > long...
> >
> > What counter ?
>
> Counter is used to generate msg id ...
> Ok, i see now... Heh , do you have any situations that message id is not
> set?
yes.
On Sunday 20 July 2003 13:51, Oded Arbel wrote:
> On Sunday 20 July 2003 15:06, Alexander Malysh wrote:
> > On Sunday 20 July 2003 13:23, Oded Arbel wrote:
> > > On Sunday 20 July 2003 14:39, Alexander Malysh wrote:
> > > > I can not undestand , why this change should be done? We use msg id
> > > >
On Sunday 20 July 2003 15:06, Alexander Malysh wrote:
> On Sunday 20 July 2003 13:23, Oded Arbel wrote:
> > On Sunday 20 July 2003 14:39, Alexander Malysh wrote:
> > > I can not undestand , why this change should be done? We use msg id
> > > only for our internally purposes and msg id has nothing t
On Sunday 20 July 2003 13:23, Oded Arbel wrote:
> On Sunday 20 July 2003 14:39, Alexander Malysh wrote:
> > I can not undestand , why this change should be done? We use msg id only
> > for our internally purposes and msg id has nothing todo with provider msg
> > id... Can you please explain why it
On Sunday 20 July 2003 14:39, Alexander Malysh wrote:
> I can not undestand , why this change should be done? We use msg id only
> for our internally purposes and msg id has nothing todo with provider msg
> id... Can you please explain why it should be needed ?
Several providers required that we r
Hi Bruno,
can you please first post such radical changes to ML before you commit these?
It would be great first to review this patch... We are in pre-release phase
now (imo)... or ?
On Sunday 20 July 2003 01:06, Bruno Rodrigues wrote:
> Hello to all.
>
> After several warnings but no one chang
Hi Oded,
I can not undestand , why this change should be done? We use msg id only for
our internally purposes and msg id has nothing todo with provider msg id...
Can you please explain why it should be needed ?
Have you sooo much traffic running on your bearerbox, so that 32bit not enough
? and
On Sunday 20 July 2003 02:06, Bruno Rodrigues wrote:
> Now it's the right time to fix what's wrong, just before releasing a new
> version ;)
Speaking of compatibility breaking - I'd like to suggest a more radical change
: changing the message ID used in kannel internal messaging to 64 bit length
Hello to all.
After several warnings but no one changing the code, I'm picking up the
job and finally fixing my own bug.
Very soon (I have already finished the code but I'm still testing and
documenting) I'll commit a patch to fix inconsistences in cgi
parameters (which were primarly caused by me
11 matches
Mail list logo
