Re: [Kannel-Users] Re: mBlox SMPP optional parameters

2004-07-15 Thread Alex Judd
So interestingly this raises some very real issues for companies such as us in the market place who connect to the MBlox gateway as one of our aggregator partners and keep getting complained at that our installations of Kannel _don't_ support the extended parameters that Ian and the team have

Re: [Kannel-Users] Re: mBlox SMPP optional parameters

2004-07-14 Thread Peter Beckman
What I'd love to see is this. From Table 5-7 in the Kannel 1.3.1 documentation, add these fields: %m message_id returned by remote SMSC %o command_id returned by SMSC %O command_status returned by SMSC This way, anyone can write a handler using the DLR reporting, and we can all

Re: [Kannel-Users] Re: mBlox SMPP optional parameters

2004-07-14 Thread Ian Cass
Nisan Bloch wrote: As for publishing with SMPP.org and hoping that the aggregators and operators will fall in line - mm I doubt it :-) - look at the variation in deliver_sm dlr text formats, look at the various non standard uses of smpp params But look at how ambiguous SMPP is! You can

RE: [Kannel-Users] Re: mBlox SMPP optional parameters

2004-07-14 Thread Hillel Bilman
the SMPP v3.4 spec. Would it be possible to return these values back as well? Thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Peter Beckman Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 7:01 AM To: Stipe Tolj Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Kannel-Users] Re: mBlox

Re: [Kannel-Users] Re: mBlox SMPP optional parameters

2004-07-14 Thread Stipe Tolj
Ian Cass wrote: Nisan Bloch wrote: As for publishing with SMPP.org and hoping that the aggregators and operators will fall in line - mm I doubt it :-) - look at the variation in deliver_sm dlr text formats, look at the various non standard uses of smpp params But look at how