Re: [PATCH] Re: Problems with the handling of DLR's / SMPP

2003-09-05 Thread Stipe Tolj
this patch has been comited by Alexander to cvs. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet:

Re: [PATCH] Re: Problems with the handling of DLR's / SMPP

2003-08-26 Thread Ian Cass
Alexander Malysh wrote: Hi, ok it has nothing with bug's in kannel to do. It is a broken smsc, what are you using (btw. known one, see comments in the patch). He's using mBlox. Bit harsh to call us broken :/ here you have requested only DLR_SUCCESS but see here, buggy smsc got us ACKED

Re: [PATCH] Re: Problems with the handling of DLR's / SMPP

2003-08-26 Thread Alexander Malysh
Hi Ian, On Tuesday 26 August 2003 20:23, Ian Cass wrote: Alexander Malysh wrote: Hi, ok it has nothing with bug's in kannel to do. It is a broken smsc, what are you using (btw. known one, see comments in the patch). He's using mBlox. Bit harsh to call us broken :/ I know, I have seen

Re: [PATCH] Re: Problems with the handling of DLR's / SMPP

2003-08-26 Thread Ian Cass
Alexander Malysh wrote: Yep, I know this too. But it is not spec conform. If the client doesn't request intermediately dlr's then smpp server should not send these (in kannel case those were missinterpreted) and second point: I have not found in smpp spec. 'ACKED' status (this status called

Re: [PATCH] Re: Problems with the handling of DLR's / SMPP

2003-08-26 Thread Alexander Malysh
On Tuesday 26 August 2003 21:28, Ian Cass wrote: Alexander Malysh wrote: Yep, I know this too. But it is not spec conform. If the client doesn't request intermediately dlr's then smpp server should not send these (in kannel case those were missinterpreted) and second point: I have not