attached
--
Paul P 'Stingray' Komkoff Jr // http://stingr.net/key <- my pgp key
This message represents the official view of the voices in my head
Index: gateway.A9/acinclude.m4
===
--- gateway.A9.orig/acinclude.m42004-11-06
Paul P Komkoff Jr wrote:
attached
ok, I may be picky again... but I'll be anyway ;)
As far as I understand, this means, libcurl support is optional via configure
switch --enable-curl, right?
Some points I'd like to see cleaned:
* moving curl_XXX functions to an "own" file instead of mudging it in
Hi,
> As far as I understand, this means, libcurl support is optional via configure
> switch --enable-curl, right?
>
> Some points I'd like to see cleaned:
>
> * moving curl_XXX functions to an "own" file instead of mudging it into
> gw/wap-appl.c. This is not the appropriate place IMO.
>
> * c
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 16:38 +0200, Dziugas Baltrunas wrote:
> A snip from doc/CodingStyle:
>
> Don't add new features and make them conditionally compiled.
> Either add them completely, or don't add them at all.
>
> Should it now be removed?
A very good catch. I think we should r
**>Subject: Re: [PATCH] curl
**>From: Enver ALTIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
**>To: devel@kannel.org
**>In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
**>Organization: Parkyeri
**>Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:09:19 +0200
**>
**>On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 16:38 +0200, Dziugas Baltrunas wro
Replying to Stipe Tolj:
> As far as I understand, this means, libcurl support is optional via
> configure switch --enable-curl, right?
Yes, that is for those people who want gwlib's http for some reason.
My testing shows that curl is more reliable, though ... ;(
> Some points I'd like to see cle
hi,
joust one idea: would it be possible to put curl things into gwlib into
extra file and provide some compat layer for kannel's http interface so
that _all_ users of gwlib/http would benefit (e.g. smsc_http/smsbox/etc.)?
Paul P Komkoff Jr wrote:
> Replying to Stipe Tolj:
>> As far as I underst
Davy Chan wrote:
**>Subject: Re: [PATCH] curl
**>From: Enver ALTIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
**>To: devel@kannel.org
**>In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
**>Organization: Parkyeri
**>Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:09:19 +0200
**>
**>On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 16:38 +0200, Dziug
Alexander Malysh wrote:
hi,
joust one idea: would it be possible to put curl things into gwlib into
extra file and provide some compat layer for kannel's http interface so
that _all_ users of gwlib/http would benefit (e.g. smsc_http/smsbox/etc.)?
good point from Alex here.
Ehh... by the way, will a
> right. That was the main intention of the clause. I don't see an active
> reason
> to remove it. Seeing the clause in such a context in legitim and holds still
> with current policy on how to add optional features, IMO.
>
> > Maybe Kalle could shed some light on the matter.
>
> yep, Kalle ma
Kalle Marjola wrote:
right. That was the main intention of the clause. I don't see an active reason
to remove it. Seeing the clause in such a context in legitim and holds still
with current policy on how to add optional features, IMO.
Maybe Kalle could shed some light on the matter.
yep, Kalle
11 matches
Mail list logo