Colin Pitrat wrote:
Hello,
I sent this patch a few days ago, but I've been told that mail with
patch attached should be prefixed with [PATCH] so I resend it.
The problem is that judging by fields_to_dcs function in sms.c, an empty
message with an activating MWI flag should result in discard
Hi,
I'm surprised that this patch hasn't been integrated or commented by
now. Is there any problem with it ?
Colin Pitrat (Bull Services Telco)
Bull, Architect of an Open World (TM)
Tél : +33 (0) 1 30 80 72 93
www.bull.com
Colin Pitrat wrote:
Hello,
I sent this patch a few days ago, but
Hello,
there hasn't been any remark on this patch, but it hasn't been committed
either. Is there a problem with it ?
Regards,
Colin Pitrat (Bull Services Telco)
Bull, Architect of an Open World (TM)
Tél : +33 (0) 1 30 80 72 93
www.bull.com
Colin Pitrat wrote:
Hello,
I sent this patch a
Hi,
yes it will remove the Empty reply from service provider message
when sending blank messages except when this message comes from a
sms-service group (mt_reply) with omit-empty set to false.
Regards,
Colin
Hillel wrote:
Hi,
Will this patch remove the Empty reply from service provider
Hi,
Will this patch remove the Empty reply from service provider message
when sending blank mt messages?
This message confuses the client that you are sending a blank message, as
there is supposed to be nothing in the message.
Thanks
Hello,
I sent this patch a few days ago, but I've been told that mail with
patch attached should be prefixed with [PATCH] so I resend it.
The problem is that judging by fields_to_dcs function in sms.c, an empty
message with an activating MWI flag should result in discard message
MWI whereas a
