also no objections were there?! also commited to cvs
On Friday 09 January 2004 15:17, Alexander Malysh wrote:
> attached userguide updates for this patch...
>
> On Friday 09 January 2004 14:44, Alexander Malysh wrote:
> > ok, here we go ;)
> >
> > version 2 of this patch does:
> > replace --with-m
no objections were there?! commited to cvs
On Friday 09 January 2004 14:44, Alexander Malysh wrote:
> ok, here we go ;)
>
> version 2 of this patch does:
> replace --with-mysql ---> --with-mysql-dir
> replace --enable-[mysql|oracle|sqlite|sdb] --->
> --with-[mysql|oracle|sqlite| sdb]
>
>
> Comment
attached userguide updates for this patch...
On Friday 09 January 2004 14:44, Alexander Malysh wrote:
> ok, here we go ;)
>
> version 2 of this patch does:
> replace --with-mysql ---> --with-mysql-dir
> replace --enable-[mysql|oracle|sqlite|sdb] --->
> --with-[mysql|oracle|sqlite| sdb]
>
>
> Comm
Alexander Malysh wrote:
>
> Hi Stipe,
>
> I hope you are healthy now ;)
sort of ;)
> It's fine with me to change things as follow:
> --with-[mysql|sdb|oracle] enable XXX support
> --with-[mysql|sdb|oracle]-dir specify XXX install directory
>
> I'm volunteer if no objections there?
yep, got fo
Hi Stipe,
I hope you are healthy now ;)
It's fine with me to change things as follow:
--with-[mysql|sdb|oracle] enable XXX support
--with-[mysql|sdb|oracle]-dir specify XXX install directory
I'm volunteer if no objections there?
On Friday 09 January 2004 12:29, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> Alexander Mal
Alexander Malysh wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
> attached you can find patch that removes unneeded DLR_[MYSQL|SDB] defines and
> --with-dlr= configure option. These confuse all users and just make no sense
> because if we compile with --enable-mysql as example we anyhow have a mysql
> dependencies.
>
>
