Hi David,
patch looks good, except errors below when no regexp.h exists:
In file included from gw/bb_smscconn.c:89:
gw/smscconn_p.h:172: error: syntax error before regex_t
gw/smscconn_p.h:172: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union
gw/smscconn_p.h:174: error: syntax error before '*'
Hi Alex,
well, this means we (e.g. I) should wrap the regex stuff in ifdefs. :(
Expect v3 this afternoon or monday)
Regards,
David
Alexander Malysh wrote:
Hi David,
patch looks good, except errors below when no regexp.h exists:
In file included from gw/bb_smscconn.c:89:
gw/smscconn_p.h:172:
On Friday 23 January 2004 15:16, David Schmitz wrote:
Hi Alex,
well, this means we (e.g. I) should wrap the regex stuff in ifdefs. :(
Expect v3 this afternoon or monday)
not necessary and ifdefs are ugly ;)
What's about defining gw_regex_t and replace regex_t and make dummy regex
functions
Alexander Malysh wrote:
On Friday 23 January 2004 15:16, David Schmitz wrote:
Hi Alex,
well, this means we (e.g. I) should wrap the regex stuff in ifdefs. :(
Expect v3 this afternoon or monday)
not necessary and ifdefs are ugly ;)
Keep quoting me :)
What's about defining
patch commited to cvs.
Known issue: kannel doesn't build on systems with missing 'regexp.h'.
(imo) all modern systems has 'regexp.h' support.
David is working on this issue...
Thanks a lot to David!
On Tuesday 20 January 2004 16:07, David Schmitz wrote:
Hi,
attached is a patch implementing
Hi list,
haven't tested the patch myself, but it looks good and is very useful.
Actually I was thinking if Kannel could implement such a functionality.
+1 for me, without any doubts :)
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, David Schmitz wrote:
Hi,
attached is a patch implementing
Dziugas Baltrunas wrote:
haven't tested the patch myself, but it looks good and is very useful.
Actually I was thinking if Kannel could implement such a functionality.
how do you mean Kannel could implement such a Kannel is a
project, projects live from the work of individuals. Kannel
eh, sorry for misplaced words.
let me rephrase: I was thinking if Kannel could have such feature, but of
course, features are not going to appear without the work of individuals :)
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Dziugas Baltrunas wrote:
haven't tested
Dziugas Baltrunas wrote:
eh, sorry for misplaced words.
let me rephrase: I was thinking if Kannel could have such feature, but of
course, features are not going to appear without the work of individuals :)
sounds different now ;)
just kidding... I know what you ment.
Stipe
mailto:[EMAIL
