[RFC] adding solaris lib dependencies

2004-10-06 Thread Stipe Tolj
Hi list, just a quick RFC for adding lib dependency checks for solaris sem_foobar() functions implemented in librt.a, in reference to bug #154. This may be added to configure.in and hence made more smooth for users that compile on solaris systems. Stipe mailto:stolj_{at}_wapme.de

Re: [RFC] adding solaris lib dependencies

2004-10-06 Thread Enver ALTIN
Hi Stipe, On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 16:17 +0200, Stipe Tolj wrote: just a quick RFC for adding lib dependency checks for solaris sem_foobar() functions implemented in librt.a, in reference to bug #154. This may be added to configure.in and hence made more smooth for users that compile on solaris

Re: [RFC] adding solaris lib dependencies

2004-10-06 Thread Alexander Malysh
Hi, how about attached patch? Stipe Tolj wrote: Hi list, just a quick RFC for adding lib dependency checks for solaris sem_foobar() functions implemented in librt.a, in reference to bug #154. This may be added to configure.in and hence made more smooth for users that compile on solaris

Re: [RFC] adding solaris lib dependencies

2004-10-06 Thread Stipe Tolj
Alexander Malysh wrote: Hi, how about attached patch? yes, but do we need to include the lib on our own in $LIBS before configure runs the Makefile.in mangle and substitutes the vars?! Or is it enough to call AC_CHECK_LIB() and it will include it on its own? Not sure. Stipe

Re: [RFC] adding solaris lib dependencies

2004-10-06 Thread Enver ALTIN
Hi, On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 17:40 +0200, Stipe Tolj wrote: yes, but do we need to include the lib on our own in $LIBS before configure runs the Makefile.in mangle and substitutes the vars?! Or is it enough to call AC_CHECK_LIB() and it will include it on its own? It should be enough. Looks

Re: [RFC] adding solaris lib dependencies

2004-10-06 Thread Alexander Malysh
Stipe Tolj wrote: Alexander Malysh wrote: Hi, how about attached patch? yes, but do we need to include the lib on our own in $LIBS before configure runs the Makefile.in mangle and substitutes the vars?! Or is it enough to call AC_CHECK_LIB() and it will include it on its own? it's

Re: [RFC] adding solaris lib dependencies

2004-10-06 Thread Enver ALTIN
On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 17:35 +0200, Alexander Malysh wrote: Hi, Hi, how about attached patch? Index: configure.in === RCS file: /home/cvs/gateway/configure.in,v retrieving revision 1.145 diff -a -u

Re: [RFC] adding solaris lib dependencies

2004-10-06 Thread Stipe Tolj
Alexander Malysh wrote: Stipe Tolj wrote: Alexander Malysh wrote: Hi, how about attached patch? yes, but do we need to include the lib on our own in $LIBS before configure runs the Makefile.in mangle and substitutes the vars?! Or is it enough to call AC_CHECK_LIB() and it will include it on its

Re: [RFC] adding solaris lib dependencies

2004-10-06 Thread Stipe Tolj
Alexander Malysh wrote: Stipe Tolj wrote: Enver ALTIN wrote: It would be a bit better to be under or over semaphore support checks. hmm, parse error ;) it's now over semaphore support check, what ist a problem here? Also, we might want to check the *-hpux-* or, sunos part of uname output, just

Re: [RFC] adding solaris lib dependencies

2004-10-06 Thread Stipe Tolj
Stipe Tolj wrote: basically I'd like to go with Enver's idea to put it in the case $host block, like we did for the libc_r.a and likse.a for OpenBSD and FreeBSD. but consider this more as a +0 option. ;) Stipe mailto:stolj_{at}_wapme.de

Re: [RFC] adding solaris lib dependencies

2004-10-06 Thread Alexander Malysh
Stipe Tolj wrote: Alexander Malysh wrote: Stipe Tolj wrote: Enver ALTIN wrote: It would be a bit better to be under or over semaphore support checks. hmm, parse error ;) it's now over semaphore support check, what ist a problem here? Also, we might want to check the *-hpux-*