[RFC] packaging 1.3.2 devel

2004-06-22 Thread Stipe Tolj
Hi list, back again from the lost space ;) In order to get the release cycles speeded up, I'll be packaging the current cvs head tree as 1.3.2 devel. Any serious objections, bugs, patched to get in 1.3.2? Please heads-up. Stipe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -

Re: [RFC] packaging 1.3.2 devel

2004-06-22 Thread David Chkhartishvili
Hi, I think radius proxy code should be rechecked. Time by time, it sends incorrect MSISDN headers, that's very confusing, espacially when using MSISDN based services (MMS,...). Thanks, On Tuesday 22 June 2004 20:17, Stipe Tolj wrote: > Hi list, > > back again from the lost space ;) > > In ord

Re: [RFC] packaging 1.3.2 devel

2004-06-22 Thread Dziugas Baltrunas
Hi Stipe, what about adding any MMSC features to this release or even the whole mmsbox (if it exists)? AFAIK there were some patches in the list, some of them even not in C language :) regards, Dziugas Baltrunas On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Stipe Tolj wrote: > Hi list, > > back again from the lost spa

Re: [RFC] packaging 1.3.2 devel

2004-06-22 Thread Paul P Komkoff Jr
Replying to Stipe Tolj: > Hi list, > > back again from the lost space ;) > > In order to get the release cycles speeded up, I'll be packaging the > current cvs head tree as 1.3.2 devel. > > Any serious objections, bugs, patched to get in 1.3.2? Please > heads-up. serious? only one, iconv code p

Re: [RFC] packaging 1.3.2 devel

2004-06-22 Thread Paul P Komkoff Jr
Replying to David Chkhartishvili: > Hi, > > I think radius proxy code should be rechecked. > Time by time, it sends incorrect MSISDN headers, that's very confusing, > espacially when using MSISDN based services (MMS,...). David, can you try my freeradius-based solution? It is very sad but I have

Re: [RFC] packaging 1.3.2 devel

2004-06-22 Thread David Chkhartishvili
Paul, I can test it... Do you keep you patches up-to-date against current cvs? On Wednesday 23 June 2004 00:13, Paul P Komkoff Jr wrote: > Replying to David Chkhartishvili: > > Hi, > > > > I think radius proxy code should be rechecked. > > Time by time, it sends incorrect MSISDN headers, that's

Re: [RFC] packaging 1.3.2 devel

2004-06-22 Thread Paul P Komkoff Jr
Replying to David Chkhartishvili: > Paul, > > > I can test it... > Do you keep you patches up-to-date against current cvs? not very often, but I'll rediff it tomorrow morning. -- Paul P 'Stingray' Komkoff Jr // http://stingr.net/key <- my pgp key This message represents the official view of t

Re: [RFC] packaging 1.3.2 devel

2004-06-22 Thread David Chkhartishvili
OK. On Wednesday 23 June 2004 01:30, Paul P Komkoff Jr wrote: > Replying to David Chkhartishvili: > > Paul, > > > > > > I can test it... > > Do you keep you patches up-to-date against current cvs? > > not very often, but I'll rediff it tomorrow morning. -- David Chkhartishvili MagtiCom Ltd. Te

Re: [RFC] packaging 1.3.2 devel

2004-06-22 Thread Stipe Tolj
Dziugas Baltrunas wrote: > > Hi Stipe, > > what about adding any MMSC features to this release or even the whole > mmsbox (if it exists)? yes it does. Unfortunatly it's closed, due to company value implications etc. > AFAIK there were some patches in the list, some of them even not in C > langu

Re: [RFC] packaging 1.3.2 devel

2004-06-23 Thread Alexander Malysh
Hi, sorry for delay... On Tuesday 22 June 2004 17:17, Stipe Tolj wrote: > Hi list, > > back again from the lost space ;) that's great, welcome back again ;) > > In order to get the release cycles speeded up, I'll be packaging the > current cvs head tree as 1.3.2 devel. please do it. Thanks! >