Alexander Malysh wrote:
Stipe Tolj wrote:
Alexander Malysh wrote:
Hi,
I'm also +1 but don't see a easy way to handle such things with CVS (and
again my ++1 for subversion switch ;)).
ok, so we have a nominee for Rene to gain cvs write access at first point.
Second point is on how to switch to
+1 from me, IMHO the proper integration of sqlbox into Kannel's core
project is long overdue and something that I personally would welcome.
Alex
Stipe Tolj wrote:
Hi list,
I'd like to promote Rene Kluwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] to gain cvs
write access in order to contribute his sqlbox as own cvs
Hi Stipe,
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 00:56 +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
I'd like to promote Rene Kluwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] to gain cvs
write access in order to contribute his sqlbox as own cvs module.
He is willing to put it under Kannel projection and maintain it inside
the cvs module. Which would
Enver ALTIN wrote:
Hi Stipe,
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 00:56 +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
I'd like to promote Rene Kluwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] to gain cvs
write access in order to contribute his sqlbox as own cvs module.
He is willing to put it under Kannel projection and maintain it inside
the cvs module.
Alexander Malysh wrote:
Hi,
I'm also +1 but don't see a easy way to handle such things with CVS (and
again my ++1 for subversion switch ;)).
ok, so we have a nominee for Rene to gain cvs write access at first point.
Second point is on how to switch to svn. Which is in fact the better choice for
+1 from me. We need new things *on the top* of Kannel.
Aarno
On 11.2.2005, at 00:56, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Hi list,
I'd like to promote Rene Kluwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] to gain cvs
write access in order to contribute his sqlbox as own cvs module.
He is willing to put it under Kannel projection and
Hi,
I'm also +1 but don't see a easy way to handle such things with CVS (and
again my ++1 for subversion switch ;)).
Stipe Tolj wrote:
Hi list,
I'd like to promote Rene Kluwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] to gain cvs write
access in order to contribute his sqlbox as own cvs module.
He is willing
Stipe,
No offences! Don't misunderstand me, it wasn't a complain. I fully
agree about the core developers taking the decisions and us
(users/fellow or ocassional contributors) just opining (having voice
but don't vote).
I'm glad we are being heared and I think none of us (not me at lease)
would
Alejandro Guerrieri wrote:
I think I qualify as one of the others not being forbidden to mention
their votes as part of an open way in decission making :) but anyway,
since I like this module a lot:
+1
great. Now, I didn't want to make it sound like that. Just wanted to invite
anyone to feel free
