On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Alejandro Guerrieri wrote:
Peter,
It would be great to have such a feature. However, IMHO the configuration
parameters are a little cumbersome and could lead to problems in the future.
The first thing I'd change is the ability to choose the %X (X = Letter of
choice). It
Peter,
It would be great to have such a feature. However, IMHO the configuration parameters are a little cumbersome and could lead to problems in the future.
The first thing I'd change is the ability to choose the %X (X = Letter of choice). It would be way to easy for people to overload an
Hi list,
I recall that we had a thread on how to add SMPP optional parameters, in a
generic way. Did this proceed to an consensus?
I don't see a way to make it the way Peter supposes it here.
Stipe
mailto:stolj_{at}_wapme.de
---
Peter Beckman wrote:
Dear Kannel Developers:
I've written about this before, but I thought I would bring it up again
because I hate patching.
Many SMSC's are starting to use the optional SMPP parameters for
information like billing issues, carrier failures, etc. Kannel really
doesn't allow for
Dear Kannel Developers:
I've written about this before, but I thought I would bring it up again
because I hate patching.
Many SMSC's are starting to use the optional SMPP parameters for
information like billing issues, carrier failures, etc. Kannel really
doesn't allow for this -- it detects the
